Skip to main content

New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences

Some Moral Implications of Its Acquisition, Possession, and Use

  • Book
  • © 1982

Overview

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine (PHME, volume 10)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (18 chapters)

  1. The Physician as Moral Arbiter

  2. The Costs of New Knowledge

  3. Costs, Benefits, and the Responsibilities of Medical Science

  4. Biomedical Knowledge: Libertarian vs. Socialist Models

  5. Biomedical Ethics and Advances in Biomedical Science

  6. Conclusions and Reflections: Present and Future Problems

Keywords

About this book

The spectacular development of medical knowledge over the last two centuries has brought intrusive advances in the capabilities of medical technology. These advances have been remarkable over the last century, but especially over the last few decades, culminating in such high technology interventions as heart transplants and renal dialysis. These increases in medical powers have attracted societal interest in acquiring more such knowledge. They have also spawned concerns regarding the use of human subjects in research and regarding the byproducts of basic research as in the recent recombinant DNA debate. As a consequence of the development of new biomedical knowledge, physicians and biomedical scientists have been placed in positions of new power and responsibility. The emergence of this group of powerful and knowledgeable experts has occasioned debates regarding the accountability of physicians and biomedical scientists. But beyond that, the very investment of resources in the acquisition of new knowledge has been questioned. Societies must decide whether finite resources would not be better invested at this juncture, or in general, in the alleviation of the problems of hunger or in raising general health standards through interventions which are less dependent on the intensive use of high technology. To put issues in this fashion touches on philosophical notions concerning the claims of distributive justice and the ownership of biomedical knowledge.

Editors and Affiliations

  • University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, USA

    William B. Bondeson

  • Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA

    H. Tristram Engelhardt

  • University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA

    Stuart F. Spicker

  • St. Paul Hospital, Dallas, USA

    Joseph M. White

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: New Knowledge in the Biomedical Sciences

  • Book Subtitle: Some Moral Implications of Its Acquisition, Possession, and Use

  • Editors: William B. Bondeson, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Stuart F. Spicker, Joseph M. White

  • Series Title: Philosophy and Medicine

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1982

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-90-277-1319-3Published: 31 January 1982

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-94-009-7725-9Published: 19 October 2011

  • eBook ISBN: 978-94-009-7723-5Published: 06 December 2012

  • Series ISSN: 0376-7418

  • Series E-ISSN: 2215-0080

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XVIII, 225

  • Topics: Ethics

Publish with us