Editors:
- First comprehensive analysis of the notion of robustness and its implications
- Contributions by the world’s leading experts in the field
- Shows the crucial link between the notion of robustness and the practical turn on philosophy of science
Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (BSPS, volume 292)
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (14 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
About this book
Editors and Affiliations
-
Paris, France
Léna Soler
-
, LHPS, Archives H. Poincaré, Nancy, France
Emiliano Trizio
-
, Department of Philosophy, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, USA
Thomas Nickles
-
, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
William Wimsatt
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Characterizing the Robustness of Science
Book Subtitle: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science
Editors: Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, William Wimsatt
Series Title: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5
Publisher: Springer Dordrecht
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, Philosophy and Religion (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
Hardcover ISBN: 978-94-007-2758-8Published: 23 March 2012
Softcover ISBN: 978-94-007-9643-0Published: 16 April 2014
eBook ISBN: 978-94-007-2759-5Published: 22 March 2012
Series ISSN: 0068-0346
Series E-ISSN: 2214-7942
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: X, 374
Topics: Philosophy of Science, History of Science, Science, Humanities and Social Sciences, multidisciplinary, Philosophy of Technology, Philosophy of Biology