Skip to main content

Beyond the Turnout Paradox

The Political Economy of Electoral Participation

  • Book
  • © 2018

Overview

  • Presents a rigorous analysis of the turnout paradox that proves its relevance has been vastly overstated
  • Analyzes political data by implementing game theory methodologies
  • Provides an alternate method for studying election and voter data

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science (BRIEFSPOLITICAL)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (5 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

​This Brief uses game-theoretic analysis to debunk the turnout paradox and offers an alternative economic model to elucidate the patterns behind the socioeconomic bias in turnout. The author argues that the turnout paradox—the idea that rational, strategic actors would not vote in an election—is an overstated problem, and that, contrary to widespread belief, game-theoretic models of elections with highly realistic parameters are compatible with high turnout. The author applies the method of stability sets to the study of voting games so as to characterize the behavior of electoral turnout in response to the game’s structural parameters. To illustrate the power and potential of this framework, the author then develops a politico-economic model that generates testable theories about the way in which the modern welfare state and redistribution of wealth can shape the patterns of biased turnout that exist in most democracies. By turning a classic problem of rational choice into a sourceof new methods of analysis this Brief allows game theory to intervene in relevant conversations about the political economy of electoral participation, creating an opportunity for formal methods to make a welcome contribution to the discipline. As such, this Brief will be of use to scholars and student of political science, economics, political economy, and public policy, especially those who work in the tradition of formal methods.   

Authors and Affiliations

  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe-Madrid, Spain

    Luis Fernando Medina Sierra

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us