The Phenomenological Critique of Mathematisation and the Question of Responsibility

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-x

   PDF

2. The Phenomenological Critique of Formalism: Responsibility and the Life-World

   • L’ubica Učník, Anita Williams, Ivan Chvatík

   Pages 1-14

3. Patočka’s “Review of the Crisis”

   1. Front Matter

      Pages 15-15

      PDF

   2. Edmund Husserl’s Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transcendentale Phänomenologie

      • Jan Patočka

      Pages 17-28

4. Patočka’s Phenomenological Philosophy

   1. Front Matter

      Pages 29-29

      PDF

   2. Jan Patočka: From the Concept of Evidence to the Natural World and Beyond

      • L’ubica Učník

      Pages 31-42

   3. Patočka on Galileo

      • L’ubica Učník, Ivan Chvatík

      Pages 43-55

   4. Nostalgia and Phenomenon: Husserl and Patočka on the End of the Ancient Cosmos

      • Burt C. Hopkins

      Pages 57-78

   5. Time in ‘Negative Platonism’

      • Pavel Kouba

      Pages 79-88

   6. ‘Quicquid Cogitat’: On the Uses and Disadvantages of Subjectivity

      • Ludger Hagedorn

      Pages 89-104

5. Husserl’s Phenomenology

   1. Front Matter

      Pages 105-105

      PDF

   2. Everydayness, Historicity and the World of Science: Husserl’s Life-World Reconsidered

      • Dermot Moran

      Pages 107-131

   3. Husserl’s Hermeneutical Phenomenology of the Life-World as Culture Reconsidered

      • Nicolas de Warren

      Pages 133-154

   4. Mathesis Universalis and the Life-World: Finitude and Responsibility

      • Rosemary R. P. Lerner

      Pages 155-174

   5. Husserl and Heidegger on the Social Dimensions of the Life-World

      • Tom Nenon

      Pages 175-184

6. The Continued Relevance of the Phenomenological Critique

   1. Front Matter

      Pages 185-185

      PDF

   2. Formalisation and Responsibility

      • James Mensch

      Pages 187-196

   3. Perceiving Sensible Things: Husserl and the Act of Perception

      • Anita Williams

      Pages 197-209

   4. Are We Still Afraid of Science?

      • Ivan Chvatík

      Pages 211-219

7. Back Matter

   Pages 221-223

   PDF

​This edited collection discusses phenomenological critiques of formalism and their relevance to the problem of responsibility and the life-world. The book deals with themes of formalization of knowledge in connection to the life-world, the natural world, the history of science and our responsibility for both our epistemic claims and the world in which we live. Readers will discover critiques of formalization, the life-world and responsibility, and a collation and comparison of Patočka’s and Husserl’s work on these themes. Considerable literature on Husserl is presented here and the two themes of epistemic responsibility and the life-world are discussed  together. This work specifically emphasizes the interrelatedness of these existential aspects of his work – self-responsibility and the crisis – as not only epistemological, but also related to human life. This volume also introduces Jan Patočka to English-speaking readers as a phenomenologist in his own right. Patočka shows us, in particular, the significance of the modern abyss between our thinking and the world. Readers will discover that this abyss is of concern for our everyday experience because it leads to a rupture in our understanding of the world: between the world of our living and its scientific construct. We see that Patočka continually emphasized the relevance of Husserl’s work to existential questions relating to human responsibility and the life-world, which he admits is left largely implicit in Husserl’s work. This edited collection will spark discussion on the question of responsibility against the backdrop of formalized knowledge which is increasingly inaccessible to human understanding. Despite the complexity of some of the analyzed ideas, this book discusses these themes in a clear and readable way. This work is scholarly, exact in its discussion and authoritative in its reading, but at the same time accessible to anyone motivated to understand these debates.

• Act of Perception
• Critiques of Formalization
• Epistemic Claims
• Epistemic Responsibility
• Ethics of Responsibility
• Evidence to the Natural World
• Formalisation and Responsibility
• Formalization of Knowledge
• Heidegger and Jan Patočka
• Husserl and Jan Patočka
• Mathematisation
• Phenomenology of the Life-World
• Responsibility and Life-World
• Scientific reasoning
• Self-critical reason
• Self-responsibility

• Philosophy, School of Arts, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia

  Ľubica Učník, Anita Williams

• The Center for Theoretical Study, The Jan Patočka Archive, The Institute of Philosophy at the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic

  Ivan Chvatík

Dr Ľubica Učník is a senior lecturer and academic chair in philosophy at Murdoch University. Her work is derived from Jan Patočka’s rethinking of phenomenological philosophy, namely, his concept of a-subjective phenomenology and his work on the transformation of modern science from Galileo to the present. She published several articles on Husserl’s mathematisation of the Lebenswelt and Patočka’s thinking on modern civilization. She recently completed a book The Life-World and the Crisis of Meaning: Husserl, Heidegger, Arendt and Patočka. Dr Ivan Chvatík Dr h. c. is the director of Jan Patočka Archive, an archive he established in 1990. In 1990, he received the Prize from the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences for the “Jan Patočka Archive Collection”, published in underground 1977-1989. Since 1993, he has been the co-director of the Center for Theoretical Study, the Institute for Advanced Study at Charles University and the Czech Academy of Sciences. In 1997, he received Jan Patočka Memorial Medal from the Czech Academy of Sciences in recognition of his role in furthering scientific research. Since 1990, he has edited 25 volumes of Jan Patočka's life works. Dr Anita Williams is a researcher in philosophy and psychology at Murdoch University. Her research is broadly focused on the history and philosophy of psychology. She is interested in phenomenology because it provides a way to question the increasingly taken for granted adoption of the scientific method for investigating human thinking and morality. Her recent work adopts Husserl’s and Heidegger’s critiques of formalisation to critique the expanding field of cognitive neuroscience.

Policies and ethics