Skip to main content

David Bohm's Critique of Modern Physics

Letters to Jeffrey Bub, 1966-1969

  • Book
  • © 2020

Overview

  • Wiith a Foreword by Jeffrey Bub

  • Bears witness to the creative philosophy developed by a brilliant physicist

  • Shows how metaphysics -- process philosophy and Indian panpsychism -- are central to Bohm’s science

  • Reveals Bohm’s opposition to the dominance of formal mathematics in physics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (9 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

In the letters contained in this book, David Bohm argues that the dominant formal, mathematical approach in physics is seriously flawed. In the 1950s and 60s, Bohm took a direction unheard of for a professor of theoretical physics: while still researching in physics, working among others with Yakir Aharanov and later Jeffrey Bub, he also spent time studying “metaphysics”—such as Hegel’s dialectics and Indian panpsychism. 50 years on, questions raised about the direction and philosophical assumptions of theoretical physics show that Bohm’s arguments still have contemporary relevance.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Abingdon, UK

    Chris Talbot

About the editor

A lifelong socialist, Chris Talbot has a PhD in General Relativity. He lectured in mathematics at the University of Huddersfield, researching in Engineering Mathematics. Now retired he has returned to work on the  letters of David Bohm whom he greatly admired as a student with an interest in Marxist philosophy.

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us