Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review
Comparative Perspectives
Editors: Zhu, Guobin (Ed.)
Free Preview- Represents the first systematic and comparative study of judicial deference
- Empirically investigates a country-based system
- Offers a combination of theory and national practice
Buy this book
- About this book
-
This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for.
Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.
- About the authors
-
Guobin Zhu, Professor of Law at School of Law, Director of Human Rights Law and Policy Forum, City University of Hong Kong; Concurrently, Director of City University of Hong Kong Press. BA, MA, LLM (RenminU of China, Beijing), LLM (HKU, Hong Kong), PhD and HDR (Aix-Marseille University, France). Titular Member, International Academy of Comparative Law; Council Member, Chinese Association of Constitutional Law, and Chinese Judicial Studies Association. Areas of Research and Interest: Comparative Constitutional and Administrative Law, Chinse and Hong Kong Constitutional and Administrative Law, Human Rights Law, and Chinese Public Administration.
- Table of contents (19 chapters)
-
-
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives
Pages 1-21
-
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Argentina
Pages 23-37
-
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Australia
Pages 39-87
-
Comparer la déférence judiciaire : regards canadiens vers l’extérieur
Pages 89-104
-
Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in China
Pages 105-131
-
Table of contents (19 chapters)
Recommended for you
Bibliographic Information
- Bibliographic Information
-
- Book Title
- Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review
- Book Subtitle
- Comparative Perspectives
- Editors
-
- Guobin Zhu
- Series Title
- Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law
- Series Volume
- 39
- Copyright
- 2019
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Copyright Holder
- Springer Nature Switzerland AG
- eBook ISBN
- 978-3-030-31539-9
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-31539-9
- Hardcover ISBN
- 978-3-030-31538-2
- Series ISSN
- 2214-6881
- Edition Number
- 1
- Number of Pages
- XIII, 445
- Topics
*immediately available upon purchase as print book shipments may be delayed due to the COVID-19 crisis. ebook access is temporary and does not include ownership of the ebook. Only valid for books with an ebook version. Springer Reference Works are not included.
