Overview
- Editors:
-
-
Isaac P. Witz
-
Department of Microbiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
-
M. G. Hanna
-
Cancer Biology Program, NCI Frederick Cancer Research Center, Frederick, USA
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (15 chapters)
-
Front Matter
Pages i-xviii
-
- Stephen W. Russell, Isaac P. Witz, Ronald B. Herberman
Pages 1-20
-
- Thomas G. Pretlow II, Theresa P. Pretlow
Pages 21-59
-
- Ronald B. Herberman, Howard T. Holden, Luigi Varesio, Tadayoshi Taniyama, Paolo Puccetti, Holger Kirchner et al.
Pages 61-78
-
- E. Klein, F. Vánky, U. Galili, B. M. Vose, M. Fopp
Pages 79-107
-
-
- Stephen W. Russell, G. Yancey Gillespie, Judith L. Pace
Pages 143-166
-
- O. Tønder, R. Matre, F. Wesenberg
Pages 167-176
-
- S. von Kleist, M. King, C. Huet
Pages 177-189
-
- Maya Ran, Margalit Yaakubowicz, Ora Amitai, Isaac P. Witz
Pages 191-211
-
-
- R. S. Kerbel, R. R. Twiddy, P. Frost
Pages 239-253
-
-
- M. G. Hanna Jr., C. D. Bucana, V. A. Pollack
Pages 267-296
-
- Gideon Berke, Barbara Schick
Pages 297-315
-
- H. Robson MacDonald, Bernard Sordat
Pages 317-342
-
Back Matter
Pages 343-348
About this book
Because of several valid (and some invalid) reasons, the research field of tumor immunology has been declining in popularity. The Simplistic dogmas, articles of faith, and theories of the late 1960s and early 1970s on the immuno logical mechanisms of the host-tumor interrelationships have frequently been refuted by some of the new developments in cancer biology, cancer biochem istry, and immunology. Furthermore, some of the conventional assays used to monitor "tumor-host immune relations" did not always reflect the host's true clinical situation or his prognosis. Several approaches to immunological interven tion were less successful than expected. In addition, the concept of "immune surveillance," which was basic to many researchers in the field of cancer im munology, seemed to fall apart. Much of the criticism was based on results from solid, well-performed, and well-controlled experiments, but there was also un just criticism based on ill-conceived and badly performed studies, and on misin terpretations of experimental data. There are many misconceptions about the tumor-host relationship. It is very often assumed that tumor immunity, as expressed systemically, is truly reflected at the tumor site. Several studies reported in this volume and elsewhere indicate that such is not always the case. Certain immune effectors may be selectively prevented from reaching the tumor site or the close vicinity of the tumor cells because of mechanical or chemical barriers, whereas others may be selectively attracted to the site by chemotaxis or other mechanisms.
Editors and Affiliations
-
Department of Microbiology, The George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Isaac P. Witz
-
Cancer Biology Program, NCI Frederick Cancer Research Center, Frederick, USA
M. G. Hanna