The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli Sylvan Kornblum OriginalPaper Pages: 130 - 135
Towards a similarity-based account of compatibility effects Koen Lamberts OriginalPaper Pages: 136 - 143
Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes Roberto NicolettiCarlo Umiltà OriginalPaper Pages: 144 - 150
The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect Thomas H. StofferAndré R. Yakin OriginalPaper Pages: 151 - 162
Hand-hemispace spatial compatibility, precueing, and stimulus-onset asynchrony John L. BradshawCatherine J. WillmottJason B. Mattingley OriginalPaper Pages: 170 - 178
Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity Bernhard Hommel OriginalPaper Pages: 179 - 184
Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect Robert W. ProctorChen-Hui Lu OriginalPaper Pages: 185 - 195
Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991) M. J. O'LearyP. J. BarberJ. R. Simone OriginalPaper Pages: 203 - 209
Stimulus congruity, irrelevant spatial SR correspondence, and display-control arrangement correspondence: A reply to O'Leary, Barber, and Simon (1994) Y. GuiardT. HasbroucqC. -A. Possamai OriginalPaper Pages: 210 - 212
Defining stimulus congruity: A rejoinder to Guiard, Hasbroucq, and Possamai (1994) P. J. BarberM. J. O'LearyJ. R. Simon OriginalPaper Pages: 213 - 215
