Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Springer
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences
Publishing model:
Hybrid

Advances in Atmospheric Sciences - 2024 Editor's Award

This year’s Outstanding Editor Awards go to the following editors:

Guixing Chen, Haishan Chen, Lei Han, Xiong Liu, Jingjia Luo, Hiroyuki Murakami, Tetsuya Takemi，Augustin Vintzileos, Aihui Wang, Zhiping Wen


2024 Editor's Award

The AAS Editor’s Award recognizes an individual reviewer for their especially thorough and impactful comments contributing to the improvement of a manuscript submitted to Advances in Atmospheric Sciences (AAS). The peer review process, and therefore the success of AAS, would not be possible without the generous contributions of time and knowledge from all participating reviewers. Nominations are submitted to the editorial office for initial consideration. Final selections are made by the Editors-in-Chief.

Our featured reviewers are those who have:

The reviewer’s comments were essential in assessing the quality of the submitted manuscript and its associated study; The reviewer’s comments were helpful to the authors and respectful of the authors’ work;|The reviewer’s comments ultimately led to the improvement of the manuscript and/or study, and therefore the advancement of the scientific and peer review processes.

AAS would like to acknowledge and thank every reviewer who has contributed time and effort to improving the content of our journal. Many reviewers go above and beyond what is asked of them and fully meet the criteria for this award, and we regret that we cannot recognize each of them publicly here. From the long list of generous and qualified reviewers, we have highlighted a few of our most outstanding reviewers.

Name                        

Affiliation

Citation
Chen, Mingxuan                                                               

Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration

For reviewing rigorously with specific feedback.

Chen, Yang

Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences

For offering detailed and objective feedback.
Dong, Buwen                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Reading University                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

For providing timely feedback on the review and delivering high-quality comments.
Fan, Yifei 

Pennsylvania State University

For consistently providing insightful and constructive review comments in a timely manner, even with extremely tight time window, which ensures AAS sticking to the highest editorial and scholarly standards.

Ge, Jinming

Lanzhou University

For being responsible and rigorous in multiple reviews.

Grimm, Alice M.

Universidade Federal do Paraná

For providing detailed and comprehensive review comments, addressing specific issues while suggesting improvements to the author's revisions.

Guo, Weidong

Nanjing University

For being diligent and meticulous in providing detailed review comments.

Huang, Hao

Nanjing University

For offering detailed feedback.
Huang, Yongjie 

University of Oklahoma

For offering comprehensive comments on the paper's innovation, structure, and writing, along with detailed suggestions to enhance its quality.

Lyu, Guokun

Shanghai Jiaotong University

For providing detailed suggestions for the entire manuscript, showing great diligence.

Ma, Yaoming

Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences

For providing three rounds of revision suggestions for a manuscript, significantly improving its quality.

Miao, Chiyuan

Beijing Normal University

For reviewing rigorously with clear and decisive feedback, providing valuable assistance to the editor in making recommendations.

Nasuno, Tomoe

Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology Yokohama Institute for Earth Sciences

For reviewing rigorously, providing a 4-page review that helps improve the quality of the manuscript.

O'Dell, Christopher

Colorado State University

For his constructive and effective review.

Pun, I. F.

NCU

For reviewing meticulously with detailed feedback.
Simmonds, Ian 

University of Melbourne

For providing detailed and meticulous revision suggestions, completing the review work on time.

Unuma, Takashi

Japan Meteorological Agency

For offering detailed feedback, assisting the editorial board in making decisions.

Wang, Bin

Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

For reviewing meticulously with detailed feedback, including 62 specific suggestions.

Wang, Lin

Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

For reviewing multiple articles rigorously.

Yao, Shun

Colorado State University

For reviewing rigorously with specific and clear feedback.

Zhou, Yaping

University of Maryland

For reviewing meticulously in multiple rounds, providing feedback down to every word and sentence, annotating the author's manuscript PDF with review comments, significantly enhancing the article's quality.


Search

Navigation