- Instructions for Authors
- Article types
- Concise Clinical Reviews
- Review procedure
- Manuscript preparation
- Manuscript Submission
- Title Page
- Specific remarks
- Text Formatting
- Artwork and Illustrations Guidelines
- Supplementary Information (SI)
- Ethical responsibilities of authors
- Research Data Policy
- After acceptance
- Open Choice
- English Language Editing
- Open access publishing
Instructions for Authors
Please note that systematic review articles should be submitted as Reviews and meta-analyses should submitted as Original Articles.
• Original Articles:
word limit 5000 words, 45 references, no more than 6 figures/tables
• Short Communications:
2500 words, 20 references, no more than 2 figures/tables.
• Reviews: word limit 10000 words, 100 references, no more than 10 figures
• Concise Clinical Reviews (see following section)
• Position Papers
• Opinion Papers
• Consensus Statements
• Case Reports:
1500 words, 1-2 figures/tables, 20 references
Invited Reviews must also be submitted online.
• Reviews invited by E. Michael Lewiecki are managed by the editorial office in New York: authors must select “F. Cosman” in the manuscript routing section of EditorialManager.
• Reviews invited by Rene Rizzoli are managed by the editorial office in Europe: authors must select “J. Kanis” in the manuscript routing section of EditorialManager.
These articles will then follow the standard peer review procedure.
All word counts listed below refer to restrictions to the main body of the article only, and are exclusive of title page, abstract, references, tables and figures.
Concise Clinical Reviews
Concise Clinical Reviews will provide brief but informative updates on common issues with clinical relevance to practicing physicians and clinical investigators. The goal of these reviews is to provide an overview of an important clinical area with key references and to provide clinical tips to assist in managing patients with osteoporosis or metabolic bone disease. Papers are not to exceed 2500 words (excluding abstract, references, figures/tables). Clinical Tips for each concise clinical review should be presented in table form. There should be no more than 40 references and no more than 2 figures/tables in addition to the Clinical Tips table. Papers should contain a structured abstract of 300 words, containing sections of Clinical Relevance, Observations, and Conclusions. The manuscript text may contain an Expert Opinion section but it must be clearly distinguished from the Conclusions that should be supported by a high level of medical evidence. Continuing Medical Education (CME) credit is offered for completion of online multiple choice questions associated with the article. Please see the section entitled CME Activity for specific details. As author of a concise clinical review, you will also be asked to prepare three learning objectives.
The target audience for Osteoporosis International Concise Clinical Reviews is clinicians who participate in the care of patients at risk for, or suffering from, osteoporosis. The audience will include individuals in primary care, endocrinology, geriatrics, gynecology, internal medicine, obstetrics, orthopedics, osteopathy, pediatrics, physiatry, radiology, rheumatology and physical therapy.
The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The National Osteoporosis Foundation designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 0.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 credit™ from organizations accredited by the ACCME. American Academy of Nurse Practitioners National Certification Program (AANP) accepts AMA PRA Category 1 credit™ from organizations accredited by the ACCME. American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA) accepts certificates of participation for educational activities certified for AMA PRA Category 1 credit™ from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
On completion of this article, you should be able to:
[Objectives should be specific for each article]
Disclosure of Commercial Support:
It is the policy of the NOF and IOF to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its sponsored publications and programs. NOF/IOF require the disclosure of the existence of any significant financial interest or any other relationship the editors, editorial board or authors have with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) discussed in an educational presentation. All authors and contributors to this continuing education activity have disclosed any real or apparent interest that may have direct bearing on the subject matter of this program. Please be advised that NOF’s accreditation status with ACCME does not imply endorsement of any commercial product discussed or point of view expressed in conjunction with this activity.
Method of Participation:
In order to claim credit, participants must complete the following:
1. Read the article.
2. Visit www.cme.nof.org and sign in. If you have not yet established an account, you will be prompted to do so.
3. Select CME Opportunities, and then select Concise Clinical Reviews to access the online CME process. On successful completion of the online test and evaluation, you will be able to download and print your certificate of credit.
4. You may also link to the article and read it from within the NOF Professional Learning Center. After reading the article, return to www.cme.nof.org to complete the CME Test and Evaluation.
5. Complete the online CME Test and Evaluation. Participants must achieve a score of 80% on the CME Test. One retake is allowed.
Estimated Time: The estimated time to complete each article and exam is 30-60 minutes.
Hardware/Software: PC or MAC with Internet access.
Date of Release: 1/1/2017 [Varies with release date]
Expiration Date: 12/31/2017 [Varies with release date] (Credit can no longer be offered after it has passed the expiration date.)
Questions: Please direct questions to +1-703-6473000 or Education@NOF.org
All manuscripts undergo strict peer review, including Reviews, Consensus Statements and Supplements.
Manuscripts are initially considered by the managing Editor-in-Chief. Any manuscript that does not meet the general certain criteria of the journal, e.g.
• relevance to the aims of the journal with the topic being of overall general interest
• sufficiently original and contributing to the advancement of the field,
• clearly written with appropriate study methods, well-supported data and conclusions which are supported by the data
will be reviewed and discussed with the local Associate Editor(s) prior to the submission being returned to the author without acceptance.
All other submitted manuscripts are assigned to an editor who will manage the external peer review process and editorial decision. The Journal encourages authors to recommend individuals who could be considered as reviewers, providing the editorial office with full names and contact details. Authors are also given the opportunity to request the exclusion of a specific reviewer. In this case, authors should provide justification for their request.
Each manuscript is reviewed by a minimum of two expert referees who will provide unbiased, critical and independent assessment of the submission. The (corresponding) author is notified by email of the editorial decision, which will include any applicable criticisms and comments from the reviewers and managing editor. The decision to accept with/without revision or otherwise, will be made by the managing editor based on the critical assessments of the experts.
Manuscripts which are returned to the authors for minor or major modifications should be resubmitted online within one or three months, respectively; otherwise, they will be considered withdrawn. Normally, revised manuscripts are reassessed by the same reviewers to determine if the authors have satisfactorily addressed their criticisms and comments. Depending upon this evaluation, the manuscript may be accepted or rejected. Any questions or concerns regarding the editorial decision on a manuscript must be submitted directly to the managing editorial office within 3 months.
All manuscripts are treated by the assigned reviewers as privileged and confidential information. Reviewers may request advice from another party, subject to the general principles of confidentiality and permission of the managing editor. Reviewers’ comments are not published or made available publicly except with the prior written permission of the reviewer, author and editor. However, reviewers’ comments are shared with the other reviewers of the same paper, and reviewers will be notified of the editor’s decision. The reviewers’ identity remains anonymous. All reviewers are asked to disclose any potential conflict that could influence their opinions of manuscripts, prior to review of manuscript.
We urge authors to follow the guidelines for authors to speed up the review and publication process.
All manuscripts are subject to copyediting upon acceptance; however, authors are asked to ensure that manuscripts from non-native English language speakers should have the language and grammar checked by a native speaker or a professional agency. Poorly written articles cannot be reviewed and will be returned to the authors.
- Authorship Criteria and Contributions
All listed authors should have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors must confirm on behalf of all authors that they have met all three of the following criteria for authorship, thereby accepting public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content:
1. substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data;
2. drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content;
3. approval of the version to be published and all subsequent versions.
If authorship is attributed to a group (such as for multi-center trials), the group must designate one or more individuals as authors or members of a writing group who meet full authorship criteria and who accepts direct responsibility for the manuscript.
Other group members who are not authors should be listed in the Acknowledgment section of the manuscript as participating investigators.
Individuals who do not meet the criteria for authorship but who have made substantial, direct contributions to the work (e.g., purely technical help, writing assistance, general or financial or material support) should be acknowledged in the Acknowledgments section of the manuscript, with a brief description of their contributions. Authors should obtain written permission from anyone they wish to list in the Acknowledgments section.
- Redundant, Duplicate or Fraudulent Publication
Authors must not simultaneously submit their manuscripts to another publication if that manuscript is under consideration by Osteoporosis International.
Redundant or duplicate publication is a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media. At the time of manuscript submission, authors must inform the editor about all submissions and previous publications that might be regarded as redundant or duplicate publication of the same or very similar work. Any such publication must be referred to and referenced in the new paper.
Copies of such material should be included with the submitted paper as a supplemental file.
Authors must not:
• Willfully and knowingly submit false data
• Submit data from source not the authors’ own
• Submit previously published material (with the exception of abstracts) without correct and proper citation
• Omit reference to the works of other investigators which established a priority
• Falsely certify that the submitted work is original
• Use material previously published elsewhere without prior written approval of the copyright holder
Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication anywhere else; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute where the work has been carried out. The publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
Please follow the hyperlink “Submit manuscript” on the right and upload all of your manuscript files following the instructions given on the screen.
Please ensure you provide all relevant editable source files. Failing to submit these source files might cause unnecessary delays in the review and production process.
Please make sure your title page contains the following information.
The title should be concise and informative.
- The name(s) of the author(s)
- The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. institution, (department), city, (state), country
- A clear indication and an active e-mail address of the corresponding author
- If available, the 16-digit ORCID of the author(s)
If address information is provided with the affiliation(s) it will also be published.
For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested.
Please provide a structured abstract of 150 to 250 words which should be divided into the following sections:
- Purpose (stating the main purposes and research question)
For life science journals only (when applicable)
- Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials
- Trial registration number and date of registration followed by “retrospectively registered”, for retrospectively registered trials
Please provide 4 to 6 keywords which can be used for indexing purposes.
Statements and Declarations
The following statements should be included under the heading "Statements and Declarations" for inclusion in the published paper. Please note that submissions that do not include relevant declarations will be returned as incomplete.
- Competing Interests: Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Please refer to “Competing Interests and Funding” below for more information on how to complete this section.
Please see the relevant sections in the submission guidelines for further information as well as various examples of wording. Please revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs.
Conflict of Interest
Authors no longer need to complete the “Authorship & Disclosure Form”. Corresponding authors must confirm that a Conflict of Interest statement has been included in the manuscript on behalf of all authors as part of the submission process.
50 words or less. Describe the rationale, main result and significance. Use language that can be understood by persons outside the field. Avoid details.
Manuscripts should be submitted in Word.
- Use a normal, plain font (e.g., 10-point Times Roman) for text.
- Use italics for emphasis.
- Use the automatic page numbering function to number the pages.
- Do not use field functions.
- Use tab stops or other commands for indents, not the space bar.
- Use the table function, not spreadsheets, to make tables.
- Use the equation editor or MathType for equations.
- Save your file in docx format (Word 2007 or higher) or doc format (older Word versions).
Manuscripts with mathematical content can also be submitted in LaTeX. We recommend using Springer Nature’s LaTeX template.
Please use no more than three levels of displayed headings.
Abbreviations should be defined at first mention and used consistently thereafter.
Footnotes can be used to give additional information, which may include the citation of a reference included in the reference list. They should not consist solely of a reference citation, and they should never include the bibliographic details of a reference. They should also not contain any figures or tables.
Footnotes to the text are numbered consecutively; those to tables should be indicated by superscript lower-case letters (or asterisks for significance values and other statistical data). Footnotes to the title or the authors of the article are not given reference symbols.
Always use footnotes instead of endnotes.
Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc. should be placed in a separate section on the title page. The names of funding organizations should be written in full.
- Introduction: Develop the study rationale and avoid a literature review. Literature should be cited only to the extent that it helps the reader understand why the question is asked. End the introduction with a stated aim or question, preferably expressed as a testable hypothesis. For example, if the study is aimed at identifying the color of apples, or asks what color are apples, state “we hypothesized that apples will be green rather than red”. The reason for this hypothesis should be contained in the rationale.
- Methods: The methods section should describe the procedures used and provide sufficient information (subjects, measurements, statistical analyses) so that a reader can evaluate the credibility of results and interpretation in the light of possible methodological limitations. Findings should be quantified when possible, and presented with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty, e.g. confidence intervals. The source or manufacturer name of all products used should be stated. Authors should always consider clarity for other workers about how and why a study was in a particular way.
- Results: Results concerning the primary testable hypothesis should be presented first. Do not save the ”best” for last. For example, if the main aim is to assess anti-fracture efficacy, present these data first and surrogates (BMD or biochemical markers) later. Data should be presented as concisely as possible, if appropriate, in the form of tables and/or graphs, although very large tables should be avoided. If authors wish to present the full data of the study and any technical details, these can be included as Electronic Supplementary Material.
- Discussion: The following paragraph structure is recommended:• A summary of the main findings from most to least important including a statement whether the results are consistent with the stated hypothesis. • Discuss how these results confirm or contrast with the published literature.• If the results differ, discuss the possible reasons for this. Details of methodology and results of published literature may be appropriate here. Avoid reviewing the literature outside the scope of the study.• Discuss the significance and implications of this new data. Having developed the rationale to define the limits of current knowledge, how does this new information advance understanding?• Write a paragraph concerning the limitations of the study. This is critical. The inferences made throughout the Discussion must be written bearing in mind the constraints of the methodological limitations of the work. Papers written without this section will not be considered for publication.• Summarize and Conclude: The conclusion is an inference. Within the constraints of the limitations of the study, the authors may boldly speculate regarding the significance of the findings and future research.
Please refer to the below Terminology guidelines and include as appropriate in your submission. All abbreviations in the abstract and text must be defined immediately at first mention and used consistently thereafter.
- Bone histomorphometry: Articles on bone histomorphometry should conform to the recommendations of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (Dempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, et al (2013) Standardized Nomenclature, Symbols and Units for Bone Histomorphometry: A 2012 Update of the Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2013;28:2-17).
- Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family members: Articles on TNF family members should conform to the recommendations of the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR President’s Committee on Nomenclature (2000) Proposed standard nomenclature for new tumor necrosis factor family members involved in the regulation of bone resorption. J Bone Miner Res 15:2293-2296).
- Bone markers: Articles on bone markers should conform to the recommendations of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (Delmas PD, Eastell R, Garnero P, et al. (2000) The use of biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int Suppl 6:S2-S17).
- Proprietary substances and materials, and instruments: The correct designation and the manufacturer’s name should be given. Where the manufacturer is not well known, the city and country should also be included.
- Units of measure: SI units should be used throughout, except where non-SI units are more common.
- Drug names: When drugs are mentioned, the international (generic) name should be used. The proprietary name, chemical composition, and manufacturer should be stated in full in the Materials and Methods section. The source of any new and experimental preparation should also be given.
- Papers describing the descriptive epidemiology of osteoporosis using BMD at the femoral neck should include T-scores derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III reference database for femoral neck measurements in Caucasian women aged 20–29 years as described in:
Kanis JA, , Adachi JD, Cooper C, Clark P, Cummings SR, Diaz-Curiel M, Harvey N, Hiligsmann M, Papaioannou A, D Pierroz D, Silverman SL, Szulc P, and the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group of IOF (2013). Standardising the descriptive epidemiology of osteoporosis: recommendations from the Epidemiology and Quality of Life Working Group of IOF. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2413-7
Available from this:
Reference citations in the text should be identified by numbers in square brackets. Some examples:
1. Negotiation research spans many disciplines .
2. This result was later contradicted by Becker and Seligman .
3. This effect has been widely studied [1-3, 7].
The list of references should only include works that are cited in the text and that have been published or accepted for publication. Personal communications and unpublished works should only be mentioned in the text.
The entries in the list should be numbered consecutively.
If available, please always include DOIs as full DOI links in your reference list (e.g. “https://doi.org/abc”).
- Journal article
Gamelin FX, Baquet G, Berthoin S, Thevenet D, Nourry C, Nottin S, Bosquet L (2009) Effect of high intensity intermittent training on heart rate variability in prepubescent children. Eur J Appl Physiol 105:731-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0955-8
Ideally, the names of all authors should be provided, but the usage of “et al” in long author lists will also be accepted:
Smith J, Jones M Jr, Houghton L et al (1999) Future of health insurance. N Engl J Med 965:325–329
- Article by DOI
Slifka MK, Whitton JL (2000) Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001090000086
South J, Blass B (2001) The future of modern genomics. Blackwell, London
- Book chapter
Brown B, Aaron M (2001) The politics of nature. In: Smith J (ed) The rise of modern genomics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 230-257
- Online document
Cartwright J (2007) Big stars have weather too. IOP Publishing PhysicsWeb. http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/11/6/16/1. Accessed 26 June 2007
Trent JW (1975) Experimental acute renal failure. Dissertation, University of California
Always use the standard abbreviation of a journal’s name according to the ISSN List of Title Word Abbreviations, see
If you are unsure, please use the full journal title.
Authors preparing their manuscript in LaTeX can use the bibliography style file sn-basic.bst which is included in the Springer Nature Article Template.
- All tables are to be numbered using Arabic numerals.
- Tables should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order.
- For each table, please supply a table caption (title) explaining the components of the table.
- Identify any previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference at the end of the table caption.
- Footnotes to tables should be indicated by superscript lower-case letters (or asterisks for significance values and other statistical data) and included beneath the table body.
Artwork and Illustrations Guidelines
Electronic Figure Submission
- Supply all figures electronically.
- Indicate what graphics program was used to create the artwork.
- For vector graphics, the preferred format is EPS; for halftones, please use TIFF format. MSOffice files are also acceptable.
- Vector graphics containing fonts must have the fonts embedded in the files.
- Name your figure files with "Fig" and the figure number, e.g., Fig1.eps.
- Definition: Black and white graphic with no shading.
- Do not use faint lines and/or lettering and check that all lines and lettering within the figures are legible at final size.
- All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide.
- Scanned line drawings and line drawings in bitmap format should have a minimum resolution of 1200 dpi.
- Vector graphics containing fonts must have the fonts embedded in the files.
- Definition: Photographs, drawings, or paintings with fine shading, etc.
- If any magnification is used in the photographs, indicate this by using scale bars within the figures themselves.
- Halftones should have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi.
- Definition: a combination of halftone and line art, e.g., halftones containing line drawing, extensive lettering, color diagrams, etc.
- Combination artwork should have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi.
- Color art is free of charge for online publication.
- If black and white will be shown in the print version, make sure that the main information will still be visible. Many colors are not distinguishable from one another when converted to black and white. A simple way to check this is to make a xerographic copy to see if the necessary distinctions between the different colors are still apparent.
- If the figures will be printed in black and white, do not refer to color in the captions.
- Color illustrations should be submitted as RGB (8 bits per channel).
- To add lettering, it is best to use Helvetica or Arial (sans serif fonts).
- Keep lettering consistently sized throughout your final-sized artwork, usually about 2–3 mm (8–12 pt).
- Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label.
- Avoid effects such as shading, outline letters, etc.
- Do not include titles or captions within your illustrations.
- All figures are to be numbered using Arabic numerals.
- Figures should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order.
- Figure parts should be denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.).
- If an appendix appears in your article and it contains one or more figures, continue the consecutive numbering of the main text. Do not number the appendix figures,"A1, A2, A3, etc." Figures in online appendices [Supplementary Information (SI)] should, however, be numbered separately.
- Each figure should have a concise caption describing accurately what the figure depicts. Include the captions in the text file of the manuscript, not in the figure file.
- Figure captions begin with the term Fig. in bold type, followed by the figure number, also in bold type.
- No punctuation is to be included after the number, nor is any punctuation to be placed at the end of the caption.
- Identify all elements found in the figure in the figure caption; and use boxes, circles, etc., as coordinate points in graphs.
- Identify previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference citation at the end of the figure caption.
Figure Placement and Size
- Figures should be submitted separately from the text, if possible.
- When preparing your figures, size figures to fit in the column width.
- For large-sized journals the figures should be 84 mm (for double-column text areas), or 174 mm (for single-column text areas) wide and not higher than 234 mm.
- For small-sized journals, the figures should be 119 mm wide and not higher than 195 mm.
If you include figures that have already been published elsewhere, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format. Please be aware that some publishers do not grant electronic rights for free and that Springer will not be able to refund any costs that may have occurred to receive these permissions. In such cases, material from other sources should be used.
In order to give people of all abilities and disabilities access to the content of your figures, please make sure that
- All figures have descriptive captions (blind users could then use a text-to-speech software or a text-to-Braille hardware)
- Patterns are used instead of or in addition to colors for conveying information (colorblind users would then be able to distinguish the visual elements)
- Any figure lettering has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1
Supplementary Information (SI)
Springer accepts electronic multimedia files (animations, movies, audio, etc.) and other supplementary files to be published online along with an article or a book chapter. This feature can add dimension to the author's article, as certain information cannot be printed or is more convenient in electronic form.
Before submitting research datasets as Supplementary Information, authors should read the journal’s Research data policy. We encourage research data to be archived in data repositories wherever possible.
- Supply all supplementary material in standard file formats.
- Please include in each file the following information: article title, journal name, author names; affiliation and e-mail address of the corresponding author.
- To accommodate user downloads, please keep in mind that larger-sized files may require very long download times and that some users may experience other problems during downloading.
- High resolution (streamable quality) videos can be submitted up to a maximum of 25GB; low resolution videos should not be larger than 5GB.
Audio, Video, and Animations
- Aspect ratio: 16:9 or 4:3
- Maximum file size: 25 GB for high resolution files; 5 GB for low resolution files
- Minimum video duration: 1 sec
- Supported file formats: avi, wmv, mp4, mov, m2p, mp2, mpg, mpeg, flv, mxf, mts, m4v, 3gp
Text and Presentations
- Submit your material in PDF format; .doc or .ppt files are not suitable for long-term viability.
- A collection of figures may also be combined in a PDF file.
- Spreadsheets should be submitted as .csv or .xlsx files (MS Excel).
- Specialized format such as .pdb (chemical), .wrl (VRML), .nb (Mathematica notebook), and .tex can also be supplied.
Collecting Multiple Files
- It is possible to collect multiple files in a .zip or .gz file.
- If supplying any supplementary material, the text must make specific mention of the material as a citation, similar to that of figures and tables.
- Refer to the supplementary files as “Online Resource”, e.g., "... as shown in the animation (Online Resource 3)", “... additional data are given in Online Resource 4”.
- Name the files consecutively, e.g. “ESM_3.mpg”, “ESM_4.pdf”.
- For each supplementary material, please supply a concise caption describing the content of the file.
Processing of supplementary files
- Supplementary Information (SI) will be published as received from the author without any conversion, editing, or reformatting.
In order to give people of all abilities and disabilities access to the content of your supplementary files, please make sure that
- The manuscript contains a descriptive caption for each supplementary material
- Video files do not contain anything that flashes more than three times per second (so that users prone to seizures caused by such effects are not put at risk)
Ethical responsibilities of authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.
Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:
• The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
• The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)).
• A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g. “salami-publishing”).
• No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions
• No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted.
Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.
• Consent to submit has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted.
• Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.
• Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.
• Requests to add or delete authors at revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.
• Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc.
If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been proven, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:
- If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
- If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note.
- The author’s institution may be informed.
Disclosure of potential conflict of interests
Authors must disclose all relationships or interests that could influence or bias the work. Although an author may not feel there are conflicts, disclosure of relationships and interests affords a more transparent process, leading to an accurate and objective assessment of the work. Awareness of real or perceived conflicts of interests is a perspective to which the readers are entitled and is not meant to imply that a financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research or compensation for consultancy work is inappropriate. Examples of potential conflicts of interests that are directly or indirectly related to the research may include but are not limited to the following:
• Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number)
• Honoraria for speaking at symposia
• Financial support for attending symposia
• Financial support for educational programs
• Employment or consultation
• Support from a project sponsor
• Position on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships
• Multiple affiliations
• Financial relationships, for example equity ownership or investment interest
• Intellectual property rights (e.g. patents, copyrights and royalties from such rights)
• Holdings of spouse and/or children that may have financial interest in the work
In addition, interests that go beyond financial interests and compensation (non-financial interests) that may be important to readers should be disclosed. These may include but are not limited to personal relationships or competing interests directly or indirectly tied to this research, or professional interests or personal beliefs that may influence your research.
The corresponding author collects the conflict of interest disclosure forms from all authors. In author collaborations where formal agreements for representation allow it, it is sufficient for the corresponding author to sign the disclosure form on behalf of all authors. Examples of the appropriate form can be found
The corresponding author will include a summary statement in the text of the manuscript, and in a separate file as a supplemental document not for review. Manuscripts without a fully complete Authorship & Disclosure form will not be considered for review.
See below examples of disclosures to include in text:
Funding: This study was funded by X (grant number X).
Conflict of Interest: Author A has received research grants from Company A. Author B has received a speaker honorarium from Company X and owns stock in Company Y. Author C is a member of committee Z.
If no conflict exists, the authors should state:
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
When reporting studies that involve human participants, authors should include a statement that should be added in a separate section before the reference list that the studies have been approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. If these statements are not applicable, authors should state: The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.
If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that the independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study.
The following statements should be included in the text before the References section:
Ethical approval: “All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”
The welfare of animals used for research must be respected. When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
For studies with animals, the following statement should be included:
“All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.”
If articles do not contain studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors, Springer recommends including the following sentence:
“This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.”
For retrospective studies, please add the following sentence:
“For this type of study formal consent is not required.”
All individuals have individual rights that are not to be infringed. Individual participants in studies e.g. have the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered and to what they have said e.g. during a study or an interview as well as to any photograph that was taken. Hence it is important that all participants gave their informed consent in writing prior to inclusion in the study. Identifying details (names, dates of birth, identity numbers and other information) of the participants that were studied should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and genetic profiles unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the participant (or parent or guardian if the participant is incapable) has given written informed consent for publication. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases, and informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific meaning.
The following statement should be included:
Informed consent: “Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”
If identifying information about participants is available in the article, the following statement should be included:
“Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.”
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements dealing with ethical concerns. The author will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
Research Data Policy
This journal operates a type 1 research data policy. The journal encourages authors, where possible and applicable, to deposit data that support the findings of their research in a public repository. Authors and editors who do not have a preferred repository should consult Springer Nature’s list of repositories and research data policy.
General repositories - for all types of research data - such as figshare and Dryad may also be used.
Datasets that are assigned digital object identifiers (DOIs) by a data repository may be cited in the reference list. Data citations should include the minimum information recommended by DataCite: authors, title, publisher (repository name), identifier.
If the journal that you’re submitting to uses double-blind peer review and you are providing reviewers with access to your data (for example via a repository link, supplementary information or data on request), it is strongly suggested that the authorship in the data is also blinded. There are data repositories that can assist with this and/or will create a link to mask the authorship of your data.
Authors who need help understanding our data sharing policies, help finding a suitable data repository, or help organising and sharing research data can access our Author Support portal for additional guidance.
Upon acceptance, your article will be exported to Production to undergo typesetting. Once typesetting is complete, you will receive a link asking you to confirm your affiliation, choose the publishing model for your article as well as arrange rights and payment of any associated publication cost.
Once you have completed this, your article will be processed and you will receive the proofs.
Offprints can be ordered by the corresponding author.
Online publication of color illustrations is free of charge. For color in the print version, authors will be expected to make a contribution towards the extra costs.
The purpose of the proof is to check for typesetting or conversion errors and the completeness and accuracy of the text, tables and figures. Substantial changes in content, e.g., new results, corrected values, title and authorship, are not allowed without the approval of the Editor.
After online publication, further changes can only be made in the form of an Erratum, which will be hyperlinked to the article.
The article will be published online after receipt of the corrected proofs. This is the official first publication citable with the DOI. After release of the printed version, the paper can also be cited by issue and page numbers.
In addition to the normal publication process (whereby an article is submitted to the journal and access to that article is granted to customers who have purchased a subscription), Springer provides an alternative publishing option: Springer Open Choice. A Springer Open Choice article receives all the benefits of a regular subscription-based article, but in addition is made available publicly through Springer’s online platform SpringerLink.
Copyright and license term – CC BY-NC
Open Choice articles do not require transfer of copyright as the copyright remains with the author. In opting for open access, the author(s) agree to publish the article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Authors will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher (or grant the Publisher exclusive publication and dissemination rights). This will ensure the widest possible protection and dissemination of information under copyright laws.
Open Choice articles do not require transfer of copyright as the copyright remains with the author. In opting for open access, the author(s) agree to publish the article under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License.
English Language Editing
For editors and reviewers to accurately assess the work presented in your manuscript you need to ensure the English language is of sufficient quality to be understood. If you need help with writing in English you should consider:
- Getting a fast, free online grammar check.
- Asking a colleague who is proficient in English to review your manuscript for clarity.
- Visiting the English language tutorial which covers the common mistakes when writing in English.
- Using a professional language editing service where editors will improve the English to ensure that your meaning is clear and identify problems that require your review. Two such services are provided by our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts. Springer authors are entitled to a 10% discount on their first submission to either of these services, simply follow the links below.
Please note that the use of a language editing service is not a requirement for publication in this journal and does not imply or guarantee that the article will be selected for peer review or accepted.
If your manuscript is accepted it will be checked by our copyeditors for spelling and formal style before publication.
● 获取快速、免费的在线 语法检查。
● 使用专业语言编辑服务，编辑人员会对英语进行润色，以确保您的意思表达清晰，并识别需要您复核的问题。我们的附属机构 Nature Research Editing Service 和合作伙伴 American Journal Experts 即可提供此类服务。
・高速なオンライン 文法チェック を無料で受ける。
・プロの英文校正サービスを利用する。校正者が原稿の意味を明確にしたり、問題点を指摘し、英語の質を向上させます。Nature Research Editing Service とAmerican Journal Experts の2つは弊社と提携しているサービスです。Springer の著者は、いずれのサービスも初めて利用する際には10%の割引を受けることができます。以下のリンクを参照ください。
영어 원고의 경우, 에디터 및 리뷰어들이 귀하의 원고에 실린 결과물을 정확하게 평가할 수 있도록, 그들이 충분히 이해할 수 있을 만한 수준으로 작성되어야 합니다. 만약 영작문과 관련하여 도움을 받기를 원하신다면 다음의 사항들을 고려하여 주십시오:
• 귀하의 원고의 표현을 명확히 해줄 영어 원어민 동료를 찾아서 리뷰를 의뢰합니다.
• 영어 튜토리얼 페이지에 방문하여 영어로 글을 쓸 때 자주하는 실수들을 확인합니다.
• 리뷰에 대비하여, 원고의 의미를 명확하게 해주고 리뷰에서 요구하는 문제점들을 식별해서 영문 수준을 향상시켜주는 전문 영문 교정 서비스를 이용합니다. Nature Research Editing Service와 American Journal Experts에서 저희와 협약을 통해 서비스를 제공하고 있습니다. Springer 저자들이 본 교정 서비스를 첫 논문 투고를 위해 사용하시는 경우 10%의 할인이 적용되며, 아래의 링크를 통하여 확인이 가능합니다.
영문 교정 서비스는 게재를 위한 요구사항은 아니며, 해당 서비스의 이용이 피어 리뷰에 논문이 선택되거나 게재가 수락되는 것을 의미하거나 보장하지 않습니다.
원고가 수락될 경우, 출판 전 저희측 편집자에 의해 원고의 철자 및 문체를 검수하는 과정을 거치게 됩니다.