Ethics and Information Technology is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the dialogue between moral philosophy and the field of information and communication technology (ICT). The journal aims to foster and promote reflection and analysis which is intended to make a constructive contribution to answering the ethical, social and political questions associated with the adoption, use, and development of ICT.

Within the scope of the journal are also conceptual analysis and discussion of ethical ICT issues which arise in the context of technology assessment, cultural studies, public policy analysis and public administration, cognitive science, social and anthropological studies in technology, mass-communication, and legal studies. In addition, the journal features research that deals with the history of ideas and provides intellectual resources for moral and political reflection on ICT.

  • Advances the dialogue between moral philosophy and the field of information and communication technology (ICT).
  • Examines the ethical, social and political questions associated with the adoption, use, and development of ICT.
  • Addresses issues that arise in the context of technology assessment, cultural studies, public policy analysis and public administration, cognitive science, social and anthropological studies in technology, mass-communication, and legal studies.

Journal information

Editor-in-Chief
  • M.J. van den Hoven
Managing Editor
  • Noëmi Manders-Huits
Publishing model
Hybrid (Transformative Journal). Learn about publishing Open Access with us

Journal metrics

2.068 (2019)
Impact factor
2.263 (2019)
Five year impact factor
89 days
Submission to first decision
343 days
Submission to acceptance
258,837 (2019)
Downloads

Latest issue

Volume 22

Issue 4, December 2020

Special Issue: Responsible Robotics

Latest articles

  1. Authors

    • Jan-Hendrik Heinrichs
    • Content type: Original Paper
    • Open Access

Journal updates

  • COVID-19 and impact on peer review

    As a result of the significant disruption that is being caused by the COVID-19 pandemic we are very aware that many researchers will have difficulty in meeting the timelines associated with our peer review process during normal times.  Please do let us know if you need additional time. Our systems will continue to remind you of the original timelines but we intend to be highly flexible at this time.

  • Call for Papers for Topical Collection:"Ethical Perspectives on Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs)" (Deadline March 25, 2021

    Editors: Karolina Zawieska, Nick Reed, Filippo Santoni de Sio

    Follow-up of the European Commission report “Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Recommendations on road safety, privacy, fairness, explainability and responsibility”


    • Scope

    Ethics and Information Technology is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the dialogue between moral philosophy and the field of information and communication technology (ICT). The journal aims to foster and promote reflection and analysis which is intended to make a constructive contribution to answering the ethical, social and political questions associated with the adoption, use, and development of ICT.


    Topic

    This Topical Collection builds on the report recently published by European Commission “Ethics of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Recommendations on road safety, privacy, fairness, explainability and responsibility”. The report was written by an Independent Expert Group established by the European Commission to advise on specific ethical issues raised by driverless mobility for road transport, with the goal to promote a safe and responsible transition to connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). Guest Editors of this Topical Collection were also among the experts who co-authored the report.

    We now welcome the contributions that would further discuss, elaborate on or challenge some of the assumptions and recommendations presented in the report. While the main emphasis is on philosophical, legal and technical perspectives on ethics of CAVs, contributions from other fields that are relevant for the development of ethical perspectives on CAVs are also welcome (e.g. manufacturers or policy-makers perspectives).


    Paper submission

    Submissions should be made through the submission system in compliance with submission guidelines. Submission of a manuscript implies that the work described has not been published before and that it is not under consideration for publication anywhere else.

    All manuscripts will be subject to a rigorous peer-review process and published as open access articles. The Topical Collection follows a rapid publication approach as the articles will be published online as soon as they are accepted for publication.


    Important dates

    • Deadline for submissions March 25, 
    • 2021Final deadline (latest) reviews April 21, 2021
    • Final deadline revisions May 27, 2021
    • Final date for publication July 1st, 2021
  • Call for Papers for Topical Collection: Ethical, Legal and Responsible AI (deadline: 15 March 2021)

    Editors: Virginia Dignum, Fosca Gianotti, Raja Chatilla

    Artificial Intelligence is transforming work, organisations, industries and society. Despite the many potential benefits of this general-purpose technology, there are significant challenges and risks, ranging from privacy, security, ethics, transparency and regulation. The prioritization of ethical, legal, and policy considerations in the development and management of AI systems to ensure responsible design, production and use of trustworthy AI requires integration of engineering, policy, law and ethics approaches. 


    This special issue is the result of collaboration between the EU Horizon 2020 projects HumaneAI-Net, TAILOR and AI4EU.


    This special issue calls for research papers, project reports, or position papers focusing on, but not limited to, the following topics: 

    • Accounts (and criteria of adequacy) of moral values, especially in the context of the human AI interaction (with reference to some prominent values in the Ethics & AI debate, e.g. accountability, privacy, fairness.)
    • Experiences on designing and operationalising Human Values and Ethical principles 
    • Methods for measuring values and norms in the human-AI ecosystem as required by an agile approach to designing for values.
    • Approaches to understand how values can change (or their balance/priorities are modified) as a side effect of complex interaction between humans and AI systems in a complex socio-technical ecosystem, also with respect to the above mentioned value hierarchy.
    • Emergence and resolutions of value conflicts by design 
    • Theory and methods to deal with ethical dilemmas and value prioritization, ensuring that such decisions are open, transparent and amenable to argumentation and participation of a wide range of stakeholders.
    • Critical scholarship addressing the power structures and imbalances as these shape the production and adoption of AI systems 
    • Ethical importance of epistemic conditions for responsibility for design and use of AI systems (e.g. contextuality of notions such as ‘understanding’ ‘explaining’ and making ‘transparent’ the working of deep learning).
    • Understand the relation of Humane-ness, human centeredness, human dignity in the application of AI.
    • Experiences in education and training of ethical, legal and responsible AI.


    Important dates

    • 15 March 2021:           Submission deadline 
    • 3 May 2021:                Notifications on decisions
    • 31 May 2021:              Major revisions deadline for selected papers
    • 5 July 2021:                Final decision on accepted papers
    • 2 August 2021:           Camera ready papers due
    • late 2021:                    Publication of special issue


    Submissions 

    This special issue welcomes submissions from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. Given the multidisciplinary character of the issue, we request all submissions to include a short description of the potential impact of the work reported and of the ethical challenges they faced in their work. Please indicate also to which of the following topics the submission contributes:


    • Computer ScienceLaw
    • Social Sciences and Humanities
    • EducationPractical applications
    • Educating at the intersection of Law, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Computer Science
    •  Length is 8000 words maximum and must be anonymous for double-blind review. 


    Suggested submission types: 

    • Research papers
    • Position papers
    • Papers describing existing projects (maximum length for this type is 2000 words) 


    Contact: Virginia Dignum: virginia@cs.umu.se


     

    Reviewing committee

    Andreas Theodorou
    Anna Monreale 
    Atia Cortes
    Barry O’Sullivan
    Catholijn Jonker
    Dino Pedreschi
    Elisa Fromont
    Francesca Rossi
    Frank Dignum
    Jose Hernandez Orallo
    Josep Domingo Ferrer
    Juan Carlos Nieves
    Marie Christine Rousset
    Mario Paolucci
    Michael Berthold 
    Paolo Torroni
    Roel Dobbe
    Ron Chrisley


  • Call for Papers for Special Issue:"Prospects for Ethical Uses of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources" Extended Deadline: March 5th, 2021

    Editors: E. Aizenberg & M. J. Dennis (TU Delft).

    We invite articles for a special issue of Ethics and Information Technology on the ethics of artificial intelligence in human resources, expected to be published in the third quarter of 2021.

    Topic Overview

    The transformative potential of deploying artificial intelligence (AI) in human resources (HR) is now widely accepted in many commercial and institutional contexts. AI recruitment companies promise that their products can save the labour of countless HR professionals, improve the selection of candidates, and do this at a fraction of the cost of the traditional recruitment process. Their products allow hundreds or thousands of job applications to be sifted and evaluated at the touch of a button. Recently, designers of these systems have become more ambitious in the range of tools they offer recruiters. While AI in the HR domain initially specialised in analysing written applications (CVs, motivation letters, etc.), the latest and most innovative products allow employers to analyse facial expressions, speech content, and even the voice tone of their potential employees. Data from these sources — so the creators claim — yield critical insights into the values and character traits of the employees, which the AI uses to make quantitative predictions about how the applicant will fare in a future workplace. As recruiters respond to social-distancing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, such tools may appear increasingly attractive.

    Not only can AI analyse job applications more efficiently, it is often touted as fairer in its selection of applicants. Designers of these systems claim that they are free of individual prejudice, systematic bias, and are even better at discerning the virtues and vices of applicants. Furthermore, some proponents have even claimed that AI could select candidates using synthetic categories that are capable of better predicting future job performance than even the most experienced HR professionals. Despite such claims, ethicists increasingly are finding reason to be sceptical of this technology. On the one hand, the ethical challenges of AI in the HR domain mirror those that have received significant attention in other AI application domains, such as policing and criminal justice, especially surrounding the problem of discriminatory profiling (Angwin et al., 2016; Barocas and Selbst, 2016). One common issue in these cases is the use of historically biased data sets in the training of AI algorithms, which results in reinforcement of historical and existing discrimination. Similarly, in the HR domain, data sets based on existing hiring practices are to be expected to replicate existing prejudice (Tambe et al., 2019). On the other hand, an emerging ethical problem that has been less investigated thus far is the manner in which the use of AI in HR infringes candidates’/employees’ autonomy over self-representation (Van den Hoven and Manders-Huits, 2008) — their ability to choose and control how they communicate their skills, motivation, personality, and experiences, while being subjected to reductionist and opaque quantification of these highly nuanced, contextual, and dynamic qualities (Delandshere and Petrosky, 1998; Govaerts and Van der Vleuten, 2013; Lantolf and Frawley, 1988). This special issue focuses on both kinds of problems.

    We invite contributions on the ethics of applying AI in the HR domain for the purpose of recruiting, hiring, employee performance assessment, etc., with special focus on (but not limited to):     

    • Autonomy and control over self-representation/presentation
    • Fairness, transparency, and justice in socio-technical HR organizational practices involving AI
    • Erosion of the idea of a labour market
    • Privacy and the right to a non-work private life
    • Appropriate distribution of roles and responsibilities among candidates/employees/employers/AI
    • Deselection by individual idiosyncrasy and other factors that are not relevant to employment

    Manuscripts should have a minimum length of approx. 5000 words and a maximum length of approx. 8000 words of content in the article (this means that title, abstract & references are not counted but that tables and quotes do count). Detailed submission guidelines are available here. During the submission process, please indicate that your submission is for the “Ethics of AI in Human Resources” special issue within the “Additional Information” step in the Editorial Manager.

    References

    • Angwin, J. Larson J., Mattu S. et al. (2016). 'Machine Bias.' ProPublica, 23 May 2016.
    • Barocas, S. and Selbst, A. D. (2016). 'Big Data’s Disparate Impact.' California Law Review 104(3): 671–732. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2477899.
    • Delandshere, G. & Petrosky, A. R. (1998) ‘Assessment of Complex Performances: Limitations of Key Measurement Assumptions.’ Educational Researcher 27(2).
    • Govaerts, M. & Van der Vleuten C. P. (2013) ‘Validity in work-based assessment: Expanding our horizons.’ Medical Education 47(12): 1164–74.
    • Harwell, D. (2019) ‘A face-scanning algorithm increasingly decides whether you deserve the job.’ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/22/ai-hiring-face-scanning-algorithm-increasingly-decides-whether-you-deserve-job/
    • Lantolf, J. P. & Frawley W. (1988) ‘Proficiency: Understanding the Construct.’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10(2).
    • Rosenfield, H. & Antonini, L. (2020). ‘Data isn’t just being collected from your phone. It’s being used to score you.’ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/31/data-isnt-just-being-collected-your-phone-its-being-used-score-you/
    • Tambe P., Cappelli, P., Yakubovich, V. (2019). 'Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward.' California Management Review 61(4): 15–42. DOI: 10.1177/0008125619867910.
    • Van den Hoven, J., and Manders-Huits, N. (2008). 'The Person as Risk, the Person at Risk.' In: ETHICOMP 2008: Living, Working and Learning Beyond Technology, pp. 408–14.
    • Van den Hoven, J., and Manders-Huits, N. (2008). ‘Moral identification in Identity Management Systems.’ The Future of Identity in the Information Society. International Federation for Information Processing Digital Library.
    • Van den Hoven, J., ‘Information Technology, Privacy, and the Protection of Personal Data.’ Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 301–21.
View all updates

Subscribe

eJournal
$79.00
Note this is only the net price. Taxes will be calculated during checkout.
  • Immediate online access with complete access to all articles starting 1997
  • Downloadable in PDF format
  • Subscription expires 12/31/2021

About this journal

Electronic ISSN
1572-8439
Print ISSN
1388-1957
Abstracted and indexed in
  1. ABS Academic Journal Quality Guide
  2. ACM Digital Library
  3. ANVUR
  4. Arts & Humanities Citation Index
  5. Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List
  6. CNKI
  7. Current Contents / Social & Behavioral Sciences
  8. Current Contents/Arts and Humanities
  9. DBLP
  10. Dimensions
  11. EBSCO Applied Science & Technology Source
  12. EBSCO Communication
  13. EBSCO Computer Science Index
  14. EBSCO Computers & Applied Sciences Complete
  15. EBSCO Discovery Service
  16. EBSCO STM Source
  17. EBSCO Science & Technology Collection
  18. EI Compendex
  19. ERIH PLUS
  20. Google Scholar
  21. INSPEC
  22. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China
  23. Japanese Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  24. Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
  25. Naver
  26. OCLC WorldCat Discovery Service
  27. PhilPapers
  28. ProQuest ABI/INFORM
  29. ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
  30. ProQuest Art, Design and Architecture Collection
  31. ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database
  32. ProQuest Arts Premium Collection
  33. ProQuest Business Premium Collection
  34. ProQuest Central
  35. ProQuest LISA (Library and Information Sciences Abstracts)
  36. ProQuest Library Science Database
  37. ProQuest Philosophy Database
  38. ProQuest Research Library
  39. ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection
  40. ProQuest Social Science Collection
  41. ProQuest Technology Collection
  42. ProQuest-ExLibris Primo
  43. ProQuest-ExLibris Summon
  44. SCImago
  45. SCOPUS
  46. Social Science Citation Index
  47. TD Net Discovery Service
  48. UGC-CARE List (India)
Copyright information

Rights and permissions

Springer policies

© Springer Nature B.V.