In Search of Criteria for ‘Fallacies’ and ‘Begging the Question’ Polycarp Ikeunobe OriginalPaper Pages: 421 - 441
Reasons for Reason-giving in a Public-Opinion Survey Martha S. ChengBarbara Johnstone OriginalPaper Pages: 401 - 420
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context Eveline T. Feteris OriginalPaper Pages: 349 - 367
Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts Ralph H. Johnson OriginalPaper Pages: 311 - 331
A Concept Divided: Ralph Johnson's Definition of Argument Christopher W. Tindale OriginalPaper Pages: 299 - 309
Kienpointner, Manfred (1996). Vernünftig argumentieren. Regeln und Techniken der Diskussion [Reasonable argumentation. Rules and techniques of discussion] Bart Garssen BookReview Pages: 259 - 262
Bondi, Marina (1998, Ed.). Forms of Argumentative Discourse. Per un'analisi linguistica dell'argomentare Carla Marello BookReview Pages: 255 - 258
D.N. Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority Mark Vorobej BookReview Pages: 251 - 255
Fisher, Alec and Scriven, Michael (1997). Critical Thinking. Its Definition and Assessment Kees de Glopper BookReview Pages: 247 - 251
Hilary Putnam's Dialectical Thinking: An Application to Fallacy Theory Louise Cummings OriginalPaper Pages: 197 - 229
How to Distinguish Good and Bad Arguments: Dialogico-Rhetorical Normativity Wouter H. Slob OriginalPaper Pages: 179 - 196
The Straw Thing of Fallacy Theory: The Standard Definition of 'Fallacy' Hans Vilhelm Hansen OriginalPaper Pages: 133 - 155
Speaking Your Mind: Large Inarticulateness Constitutional and Circumstantial John Woods OriginalPaper Pages: 59 - 79
Effing the Ineffable: The Logocentric Fallacy in Argumentation Michael A. Gilbert OriginalPaper Pages: 21 - 32
Reasoning Together: Temptations, Dangers, and Cautions Chris CampoloDale Turner OriginalPaper Pages: 3 - 19
Barbara Emmel, Paula Resch, and Deborah Tenney (eds.), Argument Revisited; Argument Redefined Michael David Hazen BookReview Pages: 499 - 502
Preconditions for Normative Argumentation in a Pluralist World Keith Graham OriginalPaper Pages: 471 - 487
The Diagnostic Power of the Stages of Critical Discussion in the Analysis and Evaluation of Problem-Solving Discussions M.A. van Rees OriginalPaper Pages: 457 - 470
Fantasy Themes and Rhetorical Visions in the Brent Spar Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of German and French Newspaper Coverage Julia Kruse OriginalPaper Pages: 439 - 456
Anecdotal, Statistical, and Causal Evidence: Their Perceived and Actual Persuasiveness Hans Hoeken OriginalPaper Pages: 425 - 437
The Search for Grounds in Legal Argumentation: A Rhetorical Analysis of Texas vs Johnson S. J. Balter OriginalPaper Pages: 381 - 395
Walton's Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning: A Critique and Development J. Anthony Blair OriginalPaper Pages: 365 - 379
Poulakos, Takis (1997), Speaking for the Polis. Isocrates' Rhetorical Education J.A.E. Bons BookReview Pages: 363 - 364
Pragma-dialectical Theory and Interpersonal Interaction Outcomes: Unproductive Interpersonal Behavior as Violations of Rules for Critical Discussion Harry Weger Jr. OriginalPaper Pages: 313 - 330
Expert Advice and Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Work of Douglas Walton Frans A. J. Birrer OriginalPaper Pages: 267 - 276
The Cardinal Principles of the National Entity of Japan: A Rhetoric of Ideological Pronouncement Takeshi Suzuki OriginalPaper Pages: 251 - 266
Ralph H. Johnson (2000), Manifest Rationality. A Pragmatic Theory of Argument M. A. Van Rees BookReview Pages: 231 - 237
Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999) William Twining BookReview Pages: 223 - 229
