Skip to main content

Approaches to Legal Rationality

  • Book
  • © 2011

Overview

  • Our book is a unique collection of new papers written by leading specialists in several scientific areas (law, logic, philosophy, politics) who try to analyze from the inside the ways and means of legal reasoning.
  • Our book includes papers from both the analytical and the continental philosophical perspectives.
  • Our book provides a state of the art in both fields "logic and law" and "theory of legal reasoning".

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (LEUS, volume 20)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (16 chapters)

  1. The Specificity of Legal Reasoning

  2. Legal Reasoning and Public Reason

  3. Logic and Law

  4. New Formal Approaches to Legal Reasoning

Keywords

About this book

Legal theory, political sciences, sociology, philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence: there are many approaches to legal argumentation. Each of them provides specific insights into highly complex phenomena. Different disciplines, but also different traditions in disciplines (e.g. analytical and continental traditions in philosophy) find here a rare occasion to meet. The present book contains contributions, both historical and thematic, from leading researchers in several of the most important approaches to legal rationality. One of the main issues is the relation between logic and law: the way logic is actually used in law, but also the way logic can make law explicit. An outstanding group of philosophers, logicians and jurists try to meet this issue. The book is more than a collection of papers. However different their respective conceptual tools may be, the authors share a common conception: legal argumentation is a specific argumentation context.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Dept. Computer Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

    Dov M. Gabbay

  • UFR de Philosophie, Université Lille III, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France

    Patrice Canivez, Shahid Rahman

  • Lille, France

    Alexandre Thiercelin

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us