Skip to main content
Book cover

Revisiting Discovery and Justification

Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction

  • Book
  • © 2006

Overview

  • Historicises and contexualizes the 'received view' of philosophy of science
  • Clears the grounds for the productive integration of history and philosophy of science
  • Caters to the recent interest in the history of philosophy of science

Part of the book series: Archimedes (ARIM, volume 14)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (13 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

The distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification has had a turbulent career in philosophy of science. At times celebrated as the hallmark of philosophical approaches to science, at times condemned as ambiguous, distorting, and misleading, the distinction dominated philosophical debates from the early decades of the twentieth century to the 1980s. Until today, it informs our conception of the content, domain, and goals of philosophy of science. It is due to this fact that new trends in philosophy of experimentation and history and sociology of science have been marginalized by traditional scholarship in philosophy. To acknowledge properly this important recent work we need to re-open the debate about the nature, development, and significance of the context distinction, about its merits and flaws. The contributions to this volume provide close readings and detailed analyses of the original textual sources for the context distinction. They revise those accounts of ‘forerunners’ of the distinction that have been written through the lens of Logical Empiricism. They map, clarify, and analyse the derivations and mutations of the context distinctions as we encounter them in current history and philosophy of science. The re-evaluation of the distinction helps us deal with the philosophical challenges that the New Experimentalism and historically, socio-politically and economically oriented science studies have placed before us. This volume thus clears the ground for the productive and fruitful integration of these new developments into philosophy of science.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Indiana University, U.S.A.

    JUTTA SCHICKORE

  • Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany

    FRIEDRICH STEINLE

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Revisiting Discovery and Justification

  • Book Subtitle: Historical and philosophical perspectives on the context distinction

  • Editors: JUTTA SCHICKORE, FRIEDRICH STEINLE

  • Series Title: Archimedes

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4251-5

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, Philosophy and Religion (R0)

  • Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-4020-4250-8Published: 27 January 2006

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-90-481-7086-9Published: 22 October 2010

  • eBook ISBN: 978-1-4020-4251-5Published: 18 April 2006

  • Series ISSN: 1385-0180

  • Series E-ISSN: 2215-0064

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XIX, 229

  • Topics: Philosophy of Science, History of Science, Epistemology, History of Philosophy

Publish with us