Skip to main content

Insanity on Trial

  • Book
  • © 1988

Overview

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law & Psychology (PILP, volume 8)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (12 chapters)

  1. Historical Development of Anglo-American Insanity Perspectives

  2. Background Issues—Basic Concepts, False Hopes, and Erroneous Beliefs

  3. Prevailing Currents, Unsettling Consequences

  4. Future Directions and Recommendations

Keywords

About this book

The insanity defense debate has come full circle, again. The current round began when John Hinckley opened fire; in 1843, it was Daniel M'Naghten who pulled the trigger; the "acts" of both would-be "insanity acquittees" provoked the press, the populace, a President, and a Queen to expressions of outrage, and triggered Congress, the House of Lords, judges, jurists, psychologists, and psychiatrists to debate this most maddening matter. "Insanity" -which has historically been surrounded by defenses, defen­ ders, and detractors-found itself once again under siege, on trial, and undergoing rigorous cross-examination. Treatises were written on the sub­ ject, testimony was taken, and new rules and laws were adopted. The dust has settled, but it has not cleared. What is clear to me is that we have got it wrong, once again. The "full circle" analogy and historical parallel to M'Naghten (1843) warrant some elaboration. Hinckley's firing at the President, captured by television and rerun again and again, rekindled an old debate regarding the allegedly insane and punishment (Caplan, 1984; Maeder, 1985; Szasz, 1987), a debate in which the "insanity defense" is centrally situated. The smolderings ignited anew when the Hinckley (1981) jury brought in its verdict-"not guilty by reason of insanity" (NGRI).

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgetown University, USA

    Norman J. Finkel

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Insanity on Trial

  • Authors: Norman J. Finkel

  • Series Title: Perspectives in Law & Psychology

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1665-7

  • Publisher: Springer New York, NY

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: Plenum Press, New York 1988

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-306-42899-9Published: 30 September 1988

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-1-4612-8924-1Published: 30 September 2011

  • eBook ISBN: 978-1-4613-1665-7Published: 06 December 2012

  • Series ISSN: 0160-4422

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: 398

  • Topics: Law and Psychology

Publish with us