Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Palgrave Macmillan

EU Rule of Law Procedures at the Test Bench

Managing Dissensus in the European Constitutional Landscape

  • Book
  • Aug 2024

Overview

Editors:
  1. Cristina Fasone

    1. Department of Political Science, Luiss University, Rome, Italy

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

  2. Adriano Dirri

    1. Department of Political Sciences, Luiss University, Rome, Italy

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

  3. Ylenia Guerra

    1. Department of Political Science, Luiss University, Rome, Italy

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

  • Looks at the EU's rule of law instruments from the perspective of powers and competences
  • Detects the sources of dissensus inherent in the design of the EU rule of law tools
  • Feeds the debate on the strengths and deficiencies of the EU rule of law toolbox

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics (PSEUP)

Buy print copy

Keywords

  • European Union Politics
  • Rule of Law
  • European Union
  • Dissensus
  • EU decision-making procedures
  • Conditionality
  • Soft Law

About this book

This book analyses the EU rule of law instruments from the perspective of the academic, inter- and intra-institutional dissensus at the EU level. The angle of analysis proposed by this book allows to detect the sources of dissensus inherent in the design of the EU rule of law toolbox and in their enforcement. The proliferation of the instruments, without any major efforts of systematization, seems to be part of the problem, with a series of overlaps. At the same time, especially in the post-pandemic context, the procedures implementing the various EU rule of law tools have become more and more intertwined, so that it becomes difficult to disentangle one from the other in terms of effects. The book could thus feed the debate on the strengths and deficiencies of the EU rule of law toolbox ten years after the first ad hoc measures were adopted, also offering some recommendations on how to turn dissensus into constructive mechanisms to improve the management of the rule of law in the EU.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Department of Political Science, Luiss University, Rome, Italy

    Cristina Fasone, Ylenia Guerra

  • Department of Political Sciences, Luiss University, Rome, Italy

    Adriano Dirri

About the editors

Cristina Fasone is Associate Professor of Comparative Public Law at Luiss University, Rome, Italy.

Adriano Dirri is Post-Doctoral Fellow in Comparative Public Law at the Luiss University, Rome, Italy.

Ylenia Guerra is Post-Doctoral Fellow in Constitutional Law at the Luiss University, Rome, Italy.

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: EU Rule of Law Procedures at the Test Bench

  • Book Subtitle: Managing Dissensus in the European Constitutional Landscape

  • Editors: Cristina Fasone, Adriano Dirri, Ylenia Guerra

  • Series Title: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics

  • Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan Cham

  • eBook Packages: Political Science and International Studies, Political Science and International Studies (R0)

  • Copyright Information: The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-031-60007-4Due: 18 August 2024

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-3-031-60010-4Due: 18 August 2024

  • eBook ISBN: 978-3-031-60008-1Due: 18 August 2024

  • Series ISSN: 2662-5873

  • Series E-ISSN: 2662-5881

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: X, 230

  • Number of Illustrations: 5 b/w illustrations

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Back to top

Search

Navigation