Overview
- Outlines a methodology for analysing and evaluating legislative argumentation in parliament
- Includes ten case studies offering a broad overview of the practice of legislative justification
- Broadens legisprudence to cover the perspective and work of MPs as elected lawmakers
Part of the book series: Legisprudence Library (LEGIS, volume 10)
Access this book
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
Table of contents (10 chapters)
Keywords
About this book
This book seeks to explore the potential and actual value of parliamentary debates as a source of legislative justification. Drawing on a sample of recent Spanish legislation, the papers collected here analyse (critically) the rationale of several laws or legislative measures as it can be reconstructed from the respective parliamentary discussions. All issues covered have given rise to intense political, legal and social controversy: they range from the combat against gender violence, the legal status of bullfighting, the protection of crime victims and the so-called ‘push-backs’ at the border, to the regulation of euthanasia, the minimum living income, underage girls’ access to abortion, and joint child custody. The volume is organised into two main parts. The first group of case studies adopt a legisprudential perspective and examine parliamentary deliberations in the light of the theory and methodology of legislative justification; the contributions in the second part followapproaches that fall outside – but are largely compatible with –legisprudence, and deal with aspects such as the rhetorical strategies employed by MPs when debating bills, and the role of elected legislators as constitutional interpreters.
Editors and Affiliations
About the editor
A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana, Dr. iur., LL.M. (Genova), is professor at the Law Faculty of the University of Zaragoza. His publications include Legitimidad a través de la comunicación (2011), Derecho y cultura de protección de datos (2012, with J.F. Muñoz), Conceptions and misconceptions of legislation (2019, ed.), La legislación en serio (2019, ed.), Rational lawmaking under review (2016, co-edited with K. Meßerschmidt), The rationality and justification of legislation (2013, co-edited with L. Wintgens) and Derechos fundamentales, principios y argumentación (2011, co-edited with L. Clérico and J. Sieckmann).
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Debating Laws
Book Subtitle: Studies on Parliamentary Justification of Legislation
Editors: A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana
Series Title: Legisprudence Library
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1
Publisher: Springer Cham
eBook Packages: Law and Criminology, Law and Criminology (R0)
Copyright Information: The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-031-46726-4Published: 03 January 2024
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-031-46729-5Due: 02 February 2024
eBook ISBN: 978-3-031-46727-1Published: 01 January 2024
Series ISSN: 2213-2813
Series E-ISSN: 2213-2856
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XVII, 316
Number of Illustrations: 13 b/w illustrations
Topics: Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History, Constitutional Law