Skip to main content

Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU

  • Book
  • © 2022

Overview

  • Analyses the EU legal framework on conflicts of jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings
  • Examines the latest regulations issued by EU institutions, as well as the relevant case law issued by the CJEU
  • Discusses the present and future role of Eurojust after Regulation (EU) 2018/1727

Part of the book series: Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice (CEICJ, volume 3)

  • 640 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

About this book

Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings established an ad hoc procedure for settling conflicts of criminal jurisdiction based on the mutual exchange of information and the establishment of direct consultations between the competent authorities with a view to reaching consensus on an effective solution. However, neither common legally binding criteria for deciding the best jurisdiction nor specific rules for the transfer of proceedings (which can occur after parallel proceedings have been identified) were established in this instrument, or in any other instrument adopted by the EU to date.

This book analyses the current EU legal framework on conflicts of jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, paying special attention to its numerous shortcomings and loopholes from a fundamental rights and due process of law perspective. The book begins with an assessment of the variousprinciples and grounds used by Member States for claiming criminal jurisdiction. Secondly, de lege lata EU procedure on the settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction, as well as its implementation in Spain and Italy, are thoroughly examined. After discussing the main principles and fundamental rights at stake, the author proposes two alternative and original de lege ferenda models for the prevention and settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, exploring the different possibilities offered by the EU’s primary law.

Similar content being viewed by others

Keywords

Table of contents (6 chapters)

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faculty of Law, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    Alejandro Hernández López

About the author

​Alejandro Hernández López is a postdoctoral research fellow and Professor of criminal procedure law at the University of Valladolid.

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us