Inference in Argumentation

This book investigates the role of inference in argumentation, considering how arguments support standpoints on the basis of different loci. The authors propose and illustrate a model for the analysis of the standpoint-argument connection, called Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT). A prominent feature of the AMT is that it distinguishes, within each and every single argumentation, between an inferential-procedural component, on which the reasoning process is based; and a material-contextual component, which anchors the argument in the interlocutors’ cultural and factual common ground. The AMT explains how these components differ and how they are intertwined within each single argument. This model is introduced in Part II of the book, following a careful reconstruction of the enormously rich tradition of studies on inference in argumentation, from the antiquity to contemporary authors, without neglecting medieval and post-medieval contributions. The AMT is a contemporary model grounded in a dialogue with such tradition, whose crucial aspects are illuminated in this book. 

• Argument Schemes
• Arguments in Context
• Aristotle's Foundation of Topics
• Cicero's Topica
• Implicit Premises
• Inference in Argumentation
• Inferential Configuration of Arguments
• Topical Tradition by Boethius
• Topical Tradition by Boethius

• Institute of Argumentation, Linguistics and Semiotics, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland

  Eddo Rigotti, Sara Greco

Policies and ethics