Skip to main content

Logic in Law

Remarks on Logic and Rationality in Normative Reasoning, Especially in Law

  • Book
  • © 1989

Overview

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library (LAPS, volume 6)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (9 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

The study presented in this book was entered upon by me from a legal point of view. 'Legal logic' has been known for a long time, concerning itself with the methodology of legal and in particular judicial reasoning. In modern days, however, this 'legal logic' is sometimes also connected with modern formal logic, as it has been developed in the works of G. Boole, A. de Morgan, G. Frege, C.S. Peirce, E. Schroder, G. Peano, A.N. Whitehead, B. Russell and others. For me this gave rise to the as yet not very specific question about the meaning of modern symbolic logic for law. Already in an early stage it appeared that, although traditional legal logic and modern symbolic logic both concern logic, this may not create the misapprehension that a similar matter is at issue. Both concern themselves (among other things) with reasonings and reasoning. Traditional legal logic is, however, as it was said by the German legal theoretician K. Engisch: "a material logic that wants us to reflect on what we have to do if we -within the limits of actual possibility- wish to reach true, or at least correct judgements" (Engisch, 1964, p.5). Modern symbolic logic on the other hand is not concerned with the truth or correctness of the result of an argument, but with its validity, i.e. the question when or under which conditions the truth (correctness) of the conclusion is guaranteed by the truth (correctness) of the premisses.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Arend Soeteman

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Logic in Law

  • Book Subtitle: Remarks on Logic and Rationality in Normative Reasoning, Especially in Law

  • Authors: Arend Soeteman

  • Series Title: Law and Philosophy Library

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7821-9

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-7923-0042-7Published: 31 December 1988

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-90-481-4035-0Published: 08 December 2010

  • eBook ISBN: 978-94-015-7821-9Published: 14 March 2013

  • Series ISSN: 1572-4395

  • Series E-ISSN: 2215-0315

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XII, 326

  • Topics: Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History, Philosophy of Law, Logic

Publish with us