Authors:
- Presents an unbiased description of the evolution of the DCFR
- Defends the harmonisation of European Private Law using techniques already available in the legal system
- Includes a thorough description of the evolution of Portuguese codification and of the Portuguese tort law system
- Presents a detailed comparison of the Portuguese and German tort law systems
- Compares the requirements of liability, particularly unlawfulness and the concept of legally relevant damage
- Seeks to apply the DCFR concept to the development of the Portuguese tort law system
- Puts forward a structured proposal to remedy the standstill created by the pure economic loss approach in Portugal
- Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (10 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
The Portuguese Civil Code Through the Prism of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR)
-
Front Matter
-
-
A Plea for the Informal Acceptance of the Concept of “Legally Relevant Damage” as a Way to Break the Stalemate Created by the Category “Pure Economic Loss”
-
Front Matter
-
-
Critical Remarks: Cutting the Gordian Knot with the DCFR
-
Front Matter
-
-
Back Matter
About this book
This book investigates whether national courts could and should import innovative solutions from abroad in the adjudication of complex legal disputes. Special attention is paid to the concept of “legally relevant damage” and its importance in overcoming the deadlock created by the category of “pure economic loss” in the Portuguese and German tort law systems. These systems are essentially based on the concept of unlawfulness (“Rechtswidrigkeit”), which limits the compensation for pure economic loss to where a protective rule is infringed. These losses have nevertheless been compensated for through the extensive interpretation of rules and the appeal to near-contractual devices, which has been detrimental to legal certainty, the equality before the law, and subjects’ freedom of action. This book explains why courts can and should take a proactive role and apply DCFR-based solutions in order to compensate for every loss that is worthy of legal protection.
Authors and Affiliations
-
Faculty of Law, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
Marta Santos Silva
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: The Draft Common Frame of Reference as a "Toolbox" for Domestic Courts
Book Subtitle: A Solution to the Pure Economic Loss Problem from a Comparative Perspective
Authors: Marta Santos Silva
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52923-3
Publisher: Springer Cham
eBook Packages: Law and Criminology, Law and Criminology (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-319-52922-6Published: 13 July 2017
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-319-85016-0Published: 01 August 2018
eBook ISBN: 978-3-319-52923-3Published: 03 July 2017
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XXXI, 275
Topics: Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law , European Law, Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History