Authors:
- Develops a new way of justifying the claims made by science about phenomenon not directly observable by humans
- Argues that it is possible to rationally justify belief in unobservable entities without relying on inference to the best explanation
- Applies the concept to key cases, including atoms and the size and shape of those parts of the universe lying beyond that which we can observe
Part of the book series: Synthese Library (SYLI, volume 402)
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (8 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
About this book
This monograph develops a new way of justifying the claims made by science about phenomenon not directly observable by humans, such as atoms and black holes. It details a way of making inferences to the existence and properties of unobservable entities and states of affairs that can be given a probabilistic justification. The inferences used to establish realist claims are not a form of, and neither do they rely on, inference to the best explanation.
Scientific Realism maintains that scientific theories and hypotheses refer to real entities, forces, and relations, even if one cannot examine them. But, there are those who doubt these claims. The author develops a novel way of defending Scientific Realism against a range of influential attacks. He argues that in some cases, at least, we can make probabilistically justifiable inferences from observed data to claims about unobservable, theoretical entities. He shows how this enables us to place some scientific realist claims on a firmer epistemological footing than has previously been the case. This also makes it possible to give a unified set of replies to the most common objections to Scientific Realism.The final chapters apply the developed conceptual apparatus to key cases from the history of science and from recent science. One example concerns realism with respect to atoms. Another looks at inferences from recent astronomical data to conclusions about the size and shape of those parts of the universe lying beyond that which we can observe.
Keywords
- Scientific Realism
- Justification of induction
- Inference to the Best Explanation
- Jean Perrin
- Justification of belief in atoms
- Unobservable entities
- The shape of space
- Justifying belief in theoretical entities
- Inductive Skepticism
- Pessimistic Meta-Induction
- Underdetermination and Theory Preference
- Eddington Inferences in Science
Authors and Affiliations
-
Department of Philosophy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
John Wright
About the author
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: An Epistemic Foundation for Scientific Realism
Book Subtitle: Defending Realism Without Inference to the Best Explanation
Authors: John Wright
Series Title: Synthese Library
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1
Publisher: Springer Cham
eBook Packages: Religion and Philosophy, Philosophy and Religion (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-030-02217-4Published: 14 November 2018
eBook ISBN: 978-3-030-02218-1Published: 02 November 2018
Series ISSN: 0166-6991
Series E-ISSN: 2542-8292
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: VIII, 220
Number of Illustrations: 16 b/w illustrations
Topics: Philosophy of Science, Theoretical, Mathematical and Computational Physics, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry