Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law

  • Book
  • © 1970

Overview

Authors:
  1. Mark H. Waddicor

    1. University of Exeter, UK

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

Log in via an institution
eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (8 chapters)

  1. Front Matter

    Pages I-XI
    Download chapter PDF

  2. Introduction to Natural Law and to the Work of Montesquieu

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 1-21

  3. The Originality of Montesquieu’s Method

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 22-45

  4. Montesquieu and Empiricism in Natural Law

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 46-64

  5. The State of Nature and the Origin of Society

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 65-99

  6. Montesquieu and Empiricism in Positive Law: The Diversity of Governments and Laws

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 100-133

  7. Rationalism in Positive Law: Montesquieu the Reformer

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 134-176

  8. Montesquieu’s Conception of Law

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 177-192

  9. Conclusion

    • Mark H. Waddicor
    Pages 193-196

  10. Back Matter

    Pages 197-215
    Download chapter PDF
Back to top

Keywords

About this book

In the last hundred years, the philosophy of natural law has suffered a fate that could hardly have been envisaged by the seventeenth and eighteenth century exponents of its universality and eternity: it has become old-fashioned. The positivists and the Marxists were happy to throw eternal moral­ ity out of the window, confident that some magic temporal harmony would eventually follow Progress in by the front door. Their hopes may not have been fully realized, but they did succeed in discrediting natural law. What is often not appreciated is the extent to which we have adopted the tenets of the philosophy they despised, borh in the field of politics, and in the field of personal and social ethics, which Barbeyrac called "la science des mreurs" and which the positivists re­ christened "social science". Consequently, though we live in a world whose freedom, such as it is, is largely a result of the popularization of the philosophy of natural law, and whose conscious and unconscious standards, such as they are, are a result of that philosophy as it became combined with Christianity, the doctrine of natural law is itself for­ gotten. In view of the oblivion into which it has fallen, natural law is a concept which means little to the average reader. All too often, Montesquieu scholars have traded on this oblivion in order to give an exaggerated picture of his originality.

Authors and Affiliations

  • University of Exeter, UK

    Mark H. Waddicor

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Back to top

Search

Navigation