Overview
- Editors:
-
-
E. L. Greve
-
G. Verriest
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (57 chapters)
-
-
Computer assisted perimetry
-
- Harutake Matsuo, Gen Kikuchi, Susumu Hamazaki, Junji Hamazaki, Eiji Suzuki, Makoto Yamada
Pages 1-7
-
-
- B. P. Gloor, U. Schmied, A. FÄssler
Pages 11-15
-
-
- G. K. Krieglstein, W. Schrems, E. Gramer, W. Leydhecker
Pages 19-24
-
- J.-H. Greite, H.-P. Zumbansen, R. Adamczyk
Pages 25-32
-
- J. Flammer, G. Nagel, A. Glowazki, H. R. Moser, F. Fankhauser
Pages 33-41
-
- Anders Heijl, Stephen M. Drance
Pages 43-48
-
- John L. Keltner, Chris A. Johnson
Pages 49-55
-
-
Psychophysical and visually evoked electrical responses
-
-
- F. Dannheim, A. Müller-Jensen, S. Zschocke
Pages 71-77
-
- J. T. W. Van Dalen, H. Spekreyse, E. L. Greve
Pages 79-83
-
-
- Bernard Schwartz, Sriram Sonty
Pages 91-96
-
Special psychophysical methods
-
-
- Emilio C. Campos, Samuel G. Jacobson
Pages 103-106
-
- Giovanni Calabria, Enrico Gandolfo, Giuseppe Ciurlo, Pietro Rossi
Pages 107-110
-
- Charles D. Phelps, Paul W. Remijan, Pierre Blondeau
Pages 111-117
About this book
The 4th International Visual Field Symposium of the International Perimetric Society, was held on the 13-16 April 1980 in Bristol, England,at the occasion of the 6th Congress of the European Society of Ophthalmology. The main themes of the symposium were comparison of classical perimetry with visual evoked response, comparison of classical perimetry with special psychophysi cal methods, and optic nerve pathology. Understandably many papers dealt with computer assisted perimetry. This rapidly developing subgroup of peri metry may radically change the future of our method of examination. New instruments were introduced, new and exciting software was proposed and the results of comparative investigations reported. There have been many confusing statements in the literature on the relative value of perimetry and the registration of visual evoked responses. Several reports attempted to bring some clarity in this issue. There is reason for further comparative research. A number of papers dealt with special psychophysical methods, i.e. methods not using the simply monocular differential threshold. The old critical fusion frequency received new attention. Fundusperimetry was used for testing spatial summation. Acuity perimetry, binocular perimetry etc. showed that there exist many possibilities for examining visual function. At present it is not clear to us what exactly the place of these methods is in our diagnostic armament. However it is quite clear that some of them are promising and may lead to a further differentiation of perimetric methods.
