Measuring Water Quality Benefits

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-xv

   PDF

2. Measuring Water Quality Benefits: An Introduction

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 1-11

3. The Conceptual Basis of Benefits Estimation

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 13-52

4. Survey Design

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 53-69

5. Contingent Valuation Design and Results: Option Price and Use Values

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 71-120

6. Measuring Option Value

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 121-144

7. The Contingent Ranking Method and Benefit Estimation

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 145-180

8. The Travel Cost Approach to Recreation Demand Modeling: An Introduction

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 181-207

9. Travel Cost Model: Data Sources and Variable Measures

   • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

   Pages 209-235

10. Generalized Travel Cost Model

    • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

    Pages 237-260

11. Comparing Direct and Indirect Benefit Estimation Approaches

    • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

    Pages 261-277

12. Research Issues in Benefit Estimation

    • V. Kerry Smith, William H. Desvousges

    Pages 279-301

13. Back Matter

    Pages 303-327

    PDF

Almost 5 years ago we began working together on research for the U.S. Environmental Protec­ tion Agency (EPA) to measure the benefits of water quality regulations. EPA had awarded a contract to Research Triangle Inst~ute (RTIl in response to a proposal that Bill wrote on measuring these benefits. After meeting with the EPA project officer, Dr Ann Fisher, the basic outlines of what would become this research were framed. Upon the suggestion of Bob Anderson, then chief of the Benefits Branch at EPA, we selected the Monongahela River as the focal point of a case study that would compare alternative benefit measurement approaches. Exactly how this case study would be done remained vague, but Ann urged that there be a survey and that nonuse benefits be included in the question­ naire design. Of course, Bill agreed. At the same time, Kerry was independently working on a review article that tied together some of the loose threads in the option value literature. He had also been thinking about how to measure option value, as well as working on ways to generalize the travel cost approach for estimating benefits of site attributes. Glenn Morris at RTI suggested that Bill have lunch with him and Kerry and that they could talk about Bill's research to see if there were any mutual interest. Over the lunch and Bill's ever present dessert in a Chapel Hill restaurant, we found out just how much we have in common.

• calculus
• environment
• production
• public goods
• valuation
• air pollution and air quality

• Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA

  V. Kerry Smith

• Research Triangle Institute, USA

  William H. Desvousges

Policies and ethics