Skip to main content

Rethinking the BSE Crisis

A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty

  • Book
  • © 2010

Overview

  • First study of scientific reasoning during the BSE epidemic in the UK
  • Comprehensive discussion of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies that is accessible to non-scientific readers
  • Longitudinal study of scientific reasoning as opposed to study of reasoning at a discrete point in time
  • Examples of reasoning drawn from primary sources (e.g. evidence presented to the public inquiry into BSE; minutes of meetings of scientific advisory committees)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (8 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

In 1986, the emergence of a novel brain disease in British cattle presented a unique challenge to scientists. How that challenge was addressed has been the subject of a public inquiry and numerous academic studies conducted to date. However, none of these investigations has sought to examine the reasoning of scientists during this critical period in the public health of the UK. Using concepts and techniques in informal logic, argumentation and fallacy theory, this study reconstructs and evaluates the reasoning of scientists in the ten-year period between 1986 and 1996. Specifically, a form of presumptive reasoning is described in which extensive use is made of arguments traditionally identified as informal fallacies. In the context of the adverse epistemic conditions that confronted scientists during the BSE epidemic, these arguments were anything but fallacious, serving instead to confer a number of epistemic gains upon scientific inquiry. This book argues for a closer integration of philosophy with public health science, an integration that is exemplified by the case of scientific reasoning during the BSE affair. It will therefore be of interest to advanced students, academics, researchers and professionals in the areas of public health science and epidemiology, as well as philosophical disciplines such as informal logic, argumentation and fallacy theory and epistemology.

Authors and Affiliations

  • , School of Arts and Humanities, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom

    Louise Cummings

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Rethinking the BSE Crisis

  • Book Subtitle: A Study of Scientific Reasoning under Uncertainty

  • Authors: Louise Cummings

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9504-6

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Medicine, Medicine (R0)

  • Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-90-481-9503-9Published: 20 August 2010

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-94-017-8491-7Published: 29 October 2014

  • eBook ISBN: 978-90-481-9504-6Published: 09 August 2010

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XV, 242

  • Topics: Epidemiology, Philosophy of Science, Epistemology, Medicine/Public Health, general, Logic

Publish with us