Skip to main content
Book cover

ECOOP 2008 - Object-Oriented Programming

22nd European Conference Paphos, Cyprus, July 7-11, 2008, Proceedings

  • Conference proceedings
  • © 2008

Overview

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS, volume 5142)

Part of the book sub series: Programming and Software Engineering (LNPSE)

Included in the following conference series:

Conference proceedings info: ECOOP 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (28 papers)

  1. Keynote

  2. Session I

  3. Session II

  4. Session III

  5. Session IV

  6. Session V

  7. Session VI

Other volumes

  1. ECOOP 2008 – Object-Oriented Programming

  2. Object-Oriented Technology. ECOOP 2008 Workshop Reader

Keywords

About this book

It is a pleasure to present the proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2008) held in Paphos, Cyprus. The conference continues to serve a broad object-oriented community with a tech- cal program spanning theory and practice and a healthy mix of industrial and academic participants. This year a strong workshop and tutorial program c- plementedthemaintechnicaltrack.Wehad13workshopsand8tutorials,aswell as the co-located Dynamic Language Symposium (DLS). Finally, the program was rounded out with a keynote by Rachid Guerraoui and a banquet speech by James Noble. As in previous years, two Dahl-Nygaard awards were selected by AITO, and for the ?rst time, the ECOOP Program Committee gave a best paper award. Theproceedingsinclude27papersselectedfrom138submissions.Thepapers werereviewed in a single-blind process with three to ?ve reviews per paper. P- liminaryversionsofthereviewsweremadeavailabletotheauthorsaweekbefore the PC meeting to allow for short (500 words or less) author responses. The - sponses were discussed at the PC meeting and were instrumental in reaching decisions. The PC discussions followed Oscar Nierstrasz’Champion pattern. PC papers had ?ve reviews and were held at a higher standard.

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us