Overview
- Editors:
-
-
D. Lemke
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany
-
M. Stickel
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany
-
K. Wilke
-
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany
- The ISO data have been released into the public domain only recently
- This is the first thorough survey what science can do with them
- Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (53 papers)
-
-
Deep Surveys
-
-
-
- Dario Fadda, David Elbaz, Pierre-Alain Duc, Hector Flores, Catherine Cesarsky
Pages 21-27
-
- Seb Oliver, Steve Serjeant, Andreas Efstathiou, Hans Crockett, Carlotta Gruppioni, Fabio La Franca
Pages 28-35
-
- Christian Surace, Andreas Efstathiou, Philippe Héraudeau, Dietrich Lemke, Seb Oliver, Michael Rowan-Robinson
Pages 36-39
-
-
- Kimiaki Kawara, Yasunori Sato, Hideo Matsuhara, Yoshiaki Taniguchi, Haruyuki Okuda, Yoshiaki Sofue et al.
Pages 49-53
-
- Hervé Dole, Richard Gispert, Guilaine Lagache, Jean-Loup Puget, Hervé Aussel, Francois R. Bouchet et al.
Pages 54-61
-
- Michael J. D. Linden-Vørnle, Hans Ulrik Nørgaard-Nielsen, Henning E. Jørgensen, Leif Hansen, Martin Haas, Ulrich Klaas et al.
Pages 62-69
-
-
Extragalactic Background
-
- Guilaine Lagache, Jean-Loup Puget, Alain Abergel, Francois-Xavier Désert, Hervé Dole, Francois R. Bouchet et al.
Pages 81-87
-
- Mika Juvela, Kalevi Mattila, Dietrich Lemke
Pages 88-95
-
- Toshio Matsumoto, Martin Cohen, Minoru M. Freund, Mitsunobu Kawada, Mark Lim, Shuji Matsuura et al.
Pages 96-105
-
- Hideo Matsuhara, Kimiaki Kawara, Yasunori Sato, Yoshiaki Taniguchi, Haruyuki Okuda, Toshio Matsumoto et al.
Pages 106-112
-
- Dave M. Alexander, Hervé Aussel
Pages 113-120
-
-
Evolutionary Models
-
-
- Jean-Loup Puget, Guilaine Lagache, Richard Gispert
Pages 136-140
-
- Andreas Efstathiou, Ralf Siebenmorgen, Michael Rowan-Robinson
Pages 141-148
About this book
Many of the ISO observers who assembled for this workshop at Ringberg c- tle met for the third time in the Bavarian Alps. At two previous meetings in 1989 and 1990 surveys were only a minor topic. At that time we were excited by the discoveries of the IRAS survey mission and wanted to follow it up with pointed observations using an observatory telescope equipped with versatile instruments. With the rapid development of detector arrays and stimulated by ISO’s Observing Time Allocation Committee, however, surveys eventually became an issue for the upcoming mission. In a review paper on “Infrared S- veys - the Golden Age of Exploration” given at an IAU meeting in 1996, Chas Beichman already mentioned that there are ISO surveys. They were at the bottom of his hit list, while the winners were future space missions (Planck, SIRTF, etc. ) and ground-based surveys in preparation (Sloan, 2MASS, DE- NIS, etc. ). He organized his table according to the relative explorable volume, calculated from the solid angle covered on the sky and the maximum distance derived from the detection sensitivity. Clearly, with this ?gure of merit, ISO, as a pointed observatory, is rated low. Applying the classical de?nition of a survey, i. e. to search in as large a volume as possible for new or rare objects and/or study large numbers of objects of various classes in order to obtain statistical properties, ISO was indeed limited.