Overview
- Identifies constitutional normativity in European constitutions
- Breaks new ground in approaches to constitutional history
- Sheds new light on historical discourses concerning fundamental laws, constitutionality, and unconstitutionality
- Presents the first English translation of the ‘Constitution du Royaume de Pologne’ (amended draft from 1813)
- Published Open Access
Part of the book series: Studies in the History of Law and Justice (SHLJ, volume 12)
Buy print copy
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Table of contents (9 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
Keywords
- Precedence of Constitution
- Normativity and Constitution
- Constitutional History of Europe
- Constitutionality of Revolutions
- American Constitutional History
- Constitutional Normativity
- Fundamental Laws
- Old Liberties in European History
- Unconstitutionality of Statutes
- Judicial Review
- Normativity and Precedence
- Constitutional precedence of the 3 May System
- Constitutional Precedence and Polish Substantial Criminal Law
- 1815 Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland
- Belgian Constitution of 1831
- 1815 Constitution of the United Kingdom of the Netherlands
- Constituent Power and Constitutionalism in 19th Century Norway
- Spirit of the Albertine Statute
- Hans Kelsen and Adolf Julius Merkl
- Open Access
About this book
This second volume of ReConFort, published open access, addresses the decisive role of constitutional normativity, and focuses on discourses concerning the legal role of constitutional norms. Taken together with ReConFort I (National Sovereignty), it calls for an innovative reassessment of constitutional history drawing on key categories to convey the legal nature of the constitution itself (national sovereignty, precedence, justiciability of power, judiciary as constituted power).
In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, constitutional normativity began to complete the legal fixation of the entire political order. This juridification in one constitutional text resulted in a conceptual differentiation from ordinary law, which extends to alterability and justiciability. The early expressions of this ‘new order of the ages’ suggest an unprecedented and irremediable break with European legal tradition, be it with British colonial governance or the French ancien régime. In fact, while the shift to constitutions as a hierarchically ‘higher’ form of positive law was a revolutionary change, it also drew upon old liberties. The American constitutional discourse, which was itself heavily influenced by British common law, in turn served as an inspiration for a variety of constitutional experiments – from the French Revolution to Napoleon’s downfall, in the halls of the Frankfurt Assembly, on the road to a unified Italy, and in the later theoretical discourse of twentieth-century Austria. If the constitution states the legal rules for the law-making process, then its Kelsian primacy is mandatory.
Also included in this volume are the French originals and English translations of two vital documents. The first – Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès’ Du Jury Constitutionnaire (1795) – highlights an early attempt to reconcile the democratic values of the French Revolution with the pragmatic need to legally protect the Revolution. The second – the 1812 draft of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland – presents the ‘constitutional propaganda’ of the Russian Tsar Alexander I to bargain for the support of the Lithuanian and Polish nobility. These documents open new avenues of research into Europe’s constitutional history: one replete with diverse contexts and national experiences, but above all an overarching motif of constitutional decisiveness that served to complete the juridification of sovereignty. (www.reconfort.eu)
Editors and Affiliations
About the editor
Ulrike Müßig, née Seif, is the Chair of the Department of Civil Law, German and European Legal History at the University of Passau. After studying law at the Universities of Würzburg and Cambridge, and as a visitor at the Université Paris II, Panthéon-Assas, she pursued her doctoral dissertation on comparative law, which was funded by the German National Academic Foundation. In 2000 she completed her postdoctoral qualification (habilitation) in European and German Legal History, Civil Law, Comparative Law and Private International Law at the University of Würzburg, which garnered her the Bayerischer Habilitationsförderpreis (1996). Her postdoctoral thesis on comparative legal history won the DFG (German Research Foundation) Heisenberg Prize in 2000, was published as a monograph in 2003, in a second edition in 2009, and in a Spanish translation “El juez legal” (Dykinson) in 2014. In 2013 Ulrike Müßig won the ERC Advanced Grant ReConFort (Reconsidering Constitutional Formation) for her research project on communication dependency of constitutional formation in 18th and 19th century Europe. Since 2014 she has been a corresponding member of the National Academy al-Andalus in the historic–judicial class (Ilustre Sociedad Andaluza de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos), and was elected into the historical–philosophical class of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in April 2015.
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Reconsidering Constitutional Formation II Decisive Constitutional Normativity
Book Subtitle: From Old Liberties to New Precedence
Editors: Ulrike Müßig
Series Title: Studies in the History of Law and Justice
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73037-0
Publisher: Springer Cham
eBook Packages: Law and Criminology, Law and Criminology (R0)
Copyright Information: The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-319-73036-3Published: 06 June 2018
Softcover ISBN: 978-3-030-10304-0Published: 25 December 2018
eBook ISBN: 978-3-319-73037-0Published: 25 May 2018
Series ISSN: 2198-9842
Series E-ISSN: 2198-9850
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: XII, 419
Topics: Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History, Legal History, Constitutional Law