Skip to main content

Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation

  • Book
  • © 2016

Overview

  • The only book dealing with the unavoidable link between bioethics and legal argumentation
  • Accurately describes and sharply assesses the main methodological approaches for clinical decision-making
  • Contains a collection of plural contributions of international scholars on the decisive and underrated topic of bioethical argumentation

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine (LIME, volume 70)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (9 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book clarifies the meaning of the most important and pervasive concepts and tools in bioethical argumentation (principles, values, dignity, rights, duties, deliberation, prudence) and assesses the methodological suitability of the main methods for clinical decision-making and argumentation. The first part of the book is devoted to the most developed or promising approaches regarding bioethical argumentation, namely those based on principles, values and human rights. The authors then continue to deal with the contributions and shortcomings of these approaches and suggest further developments by means of substantive and procedural elements and concepts from practical philosophy, normative systems theory, theory of action, human rights and legal argumentation. Furthermore, new models of biomedical and health care decision-making, which overcome the aforementioned criticism and stress the relevance of the argumentative responsibility, are included.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR), Logroño, Spain

    Pedro Serna

  • Research Group Philosophy, Constitution and Rationality School of Law, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

    José-Antonio Seoane

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us