Skip to main content

Rational Lawmaking under Review

Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court

  • Book
  • © 2016

Overview

  • Discusses the virtues and problems of the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking
  • Analyzes the judicial review of the quality of the legislative method
  • Focuses on the German constitutional case-law as a highly developed example of the judicial control
  • Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Part of the book series: Legisprudence Library (LEGIS, volume 3)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (15 chapters)

  1. Judicial Review, Democracy, and Legislation Theory

  2. Judicial Review of Legislative Rationality and Justification

  3. Judicial Review of Legislative Consistency and Systematicity

  4. Judicial Review of Legislative Facts and Impacts

  5. Legislative Balancing, Proportionality, and Process Review

Keywords

About this book

This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court´s approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers’ duty to legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on ‘legisprudence under review’, this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

    Klaus Meßerschmidt

  • Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana

About the editors

Klaus Meßerschmidt, Dr. iur., is adjunct professor of public law at Humboldt University of Berlin and lecturer at the University of Erlangen-Nürnberg. He obtained his doctorate in law at the University of Trier (1986) and his habilitation at the University of Berlin (2000). His research concentrates on legisprudence, originating from his postdoctoral thesis on legislative discretion (Gesetzgebungsermessen), and environmental law. His teaching interests are in constitutional and European law. His recent publications include a textbook on European Environmental Law (Europäisches Umweltrecht, München, C. H. Beck, 2011).

A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana, Dr. iur., LL.M. (Genova), is currently a Ramón y Cajal Fellow at the University of Zaragoza’s Law Faculty, where he lectures on jurisprudence. His works include a book on legal communication (Legitimidad a través de la comunicación, 2011), a socio-legal study on data protection law (Derecho y cultura de protección de datos, 2012, with J.F. Muñoz) and The Rationality and Justification of Legislation (2013, co-edited with L. Wintgens).


Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Rational Lawmaking under Review

  • Book Subtitle: Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court

  • Editors: Klaus Meßerschmidt , A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana

  • Series Title: Legisprudence Library

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8

  • Publisher: Springer Cham

  • eBook Packages: Law and Criminology, Law and Criminology (R0)

  • Copyright Information: Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-3-319-33215-4Published: 03 August 2016

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-3-319-81457-5Published: 30 May 2018

  • eBook ISBN: 978-3-319-33217-8Published: 26 July 2016

  • Series ISSN: 2213-2813

  • Series E-ISSN: 2213-2856

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: VIII, 412

  • Number of Illustrations: 1 b/w illustrations

  • Topics: Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History, Political Theory, Philosophy of Law, Constitutional Law

Publish with us