Overview
- Editors:
-
-
Martin Lipkin
-
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, USA
-
Robert A. Good
-
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, USA
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (26 chapters)
-
Front Matter
Pages i-xvii
-
Biological Organization of Gastrointestinal Mucosa
-
-
- Eleanor E. Deschner, Martin Lipkin
Pages 3-27
-
- Maria de Sousa, Robert A. Good
Pages 29-47
-
Individual and Familial Susceptibility to Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Immune Mechanisms
-
-
- Beatrice D. Spector, John H. Kersey, Robert A. Good
Pages 51-70
-
-
-
- Maxime Seligmann, Jean-Claude Rambaud
Pages 119-141
-
Individual and Familial Susceptibility to Gastrointestinal Malignancy: Environmental and Hereditary Factors
-
Front Matter
Pages 143-143
-
- Joanna F. Haas, David Schottenfeld
Pages 145-172
-
- Joanna F. Haas, David Schottenfeld
Pages 173-206
-
- David Schottenfeld, Joanna F. Haas
Pages 207-240
-
- Henry T. Lynch, Patrick M. Lynch
Pages 241-274
-
- H. J. R. Bussey, Basil C. Morson
Pages 275-294
-
- Nathan Lane, Cecilia M. Fenoglio, Gordon I. Kaye, Robert R. Pascal
Pages 295-324
-
Use of Experimental Models
-
Front Matter
Pages 325-325
-
- Takashi Sugimura, Takashi Kawachi
Pages 327-341
-
-
About this book
In observing the development of modern scientific knowledge, many indivi duals have expressed concern over the rapid growth of information in various specialized disciplines. Over 100 years ago the first Secretary of the Smith sonian Institution, and more recently Dr. Vannevar Bush while proposing the modern expansion of the National Institutes of Health, both noted prob lems that prevented the proper utilization of information by individuals in medical and related scientific fields. These observations, tagether with con comitant implications of future difficulty, are particularly pertinent to the field of oncology. The rapid evolution of the latter discipline has largely been aided by the incorporation of concepts and methods developed over a long period of time, and drawn from a wide variety of other scientific fields. The large body of discoveries that have contributed to our current understanding of neoplasia, however, cannot be viewed as being made up of equal parts. They bring to mind Claude Bernard's view "des determinismes simples et complexes" in the physiological and biochemical regulation of bod ily functions. He was able to observe that the most important and basic of physiologic processes were destined to be fewer in number than those of less fundamental and more highly specialized purpose. He understood that in the future development of medical science, sturlies of the lauer would occupy much of the time and attention of investigators, and were likely to contribute much to scientific literature.