Overview
- Editors:
-
-
Chandler Davis
-
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
-
Branko Grünbaum
-
Department of Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
-
F. A. Sherk
-
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (43 papers)
-
Front Matter
Pages i-viii
-
Introduction
-
- Chandler Davis, Branko Grünbaum, F. A. Sherk
Pages 1-3
-
H. S. M. Coxeter: Published Works
-
- Chandler Davis, Branko Grünbaum, F. A. Sherk
Pages 5-13
-
Polytopes and Honeycombs
-
-
- Branko Grünbaum, J. C. P. Miller, G. C. Shephard
Pages 17-64
-
- Branko Grünbaum, G. C. Shephard
Pages 65-98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- J. M. Goethals, J. J. Seidel
Pages 203-218
-
-
-
-
Extremal Problems
-
Front Matter
Pages 251-251
-
About this book
Geometry has been defined as that part of mathematics which makes appeal to the sense of sight; but this definition is thrown in doubt by the existence of great geometers who were blind or nearly so, such as Leonhard Euler. Sometimes it seems that geometric methods in analysis, so-called, consist in having recourse to notions outside those apparently relevant, so that geometry must be the joining of unlike strands; but then what shall we say of the importance of axiomatic programmes in geometry, where reference to notions outside a restricted reper tory is banned? Whatever its definition, geometry clearly has been more than the sum of its results, more than the consequences of some few axiom sets. It has been a major current in mathematics, with a distinctive approach and a distinc ti v e spirit. A current, furthermore, which has not been constant. In the 1930s, after a period of pervasive prominence, it appeared to be in decline, even passe. These same years were those in which H. S. M. Coxeter was beginning his scientific work. Undeterred by the unfashionability of geometry, Coxeter pursued it with devotion and inspiration. By the 1950s he appeared to the broader mathematical world as a consummate practitioner of a peculiar, out-of-the-way art. Today there is no longer anything that out-of-the-way about it. Coxeter has contributed to, exemplified, we could almost say presided over an unanticipated and dra matic revival of geometry.
