Skip to main content
Book cover

Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems

  • Book
  • © 1979

Overview

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy (SLAP, volume 6)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (20 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

I. MASS TERMS, COUNT TERMS, AND SORTAL TERMS Central examples of mass terms are easy to come by. 'Water', 'smoke', 'gold', etc. , differ in their syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic properties from count terms such as 'man', 'star', 'wastebasket', etc. Syntactically, it seems, mass terms do, but singular count terms do not, admit the quantifier phrases 'much', 'an amount of', 'a little', etc. The typical indefinite article for them is 'some' (unstressed)!, and this article cannot be used with singular count terms. Count terms, but not mass terms, use the quantifiers 'each', 'every', 'some', 'few', 'many'; and they use 'a(n)' as the indefinite article. They can, unlike the mass terms, take numerals as prefixes. Mass terms seem not to have a plural. Semantically, philo­ sophers have characterized count terms as denoting (classes of?) indi­ vidual objects, whereas what mass terms denote are cumulative and dissective. (That is, a mass term is supposed to be true of any sum of things (stuff) it is true of, and true of any part of anything of which it is true). Pragmatically, it seems that speakers use count terms when they wish to refer to individual objects, or when they wish to reidentify a particular already introduced into discoursc. Given a "space appropriate" to a count term C, it makes sense to ask how many C's there are in that space.

Editors and Affiliations

  • University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Francis Jeffry Pelletier

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems

  • Editors: Francis Jeffry Pelletier

  • Series Title: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4110-5

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1979

  • Hardcover ISBN: 978-90-277-0931-8Published: 31 March 1979

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-1-4020-3265-3Published: 04 April 2005

  • eBook ISBN: 978-1-4020-4110-5Published: 08 November 2007

  • Series ISSN: 0924-4662

  • Series E-ISSN: 2215-034X

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XIII, 305

  • Topics: Grammar, Syntax, Philosophy of Language

Publish with us