Truth Commissions and Courts

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-viii

   PDF

2. A Synergistic Relationship: The Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the Special Court for Sierra Leone

   • William Schabas

   Pages 3-54

3. The Contribution of the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission to Prosecutions

   • Eduardo Gonzaález Cueva

   Pages 55-66

4. The Inter-Relationship Between the Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification and the Search for Justice in National Courts

   • Susan Kemp

   Pages 67-103

5. The Salvadoran Truth Commission and the Search for Justice

   • Margaret Popkin

   Pages 105-124

6. An Overview of Ghana's National Reconciliation Commission and its Relationship with the Courts

   • Ken Agyemang Attafuah

   Pages 125-134

7. Justice and Reconciliation in East Timor. The Relationship Between the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation and the Courts

   • Patrick Burgess

   Pages 135-158

8. Initial Truth Establishment by Transitional Bodies and the Fight Against Denial

   • Martin Imbleau

   Pages 159-192

9. Whose Truth? Objective Truth and a Challenge for History

   • Tristram Hunt

   Pages 193-198

10. Truth, Law and Official Denial: The Case of Bloody Sunday

    • Angela Hegarty

    Pages 199-246

11. Back Matter

    Pages 247-272

    PDF

Criminal justice for human rights abuses committed during periods of political repression or dictatorship is one of the great challenges to post-con?ict societies. In many cases, there has been no justice at all. Sometimes serious political concerns that e?orts at accountability might upset fragile peace settlements have militated in favour of no action and no accountability. In many cases, the outgoing tyrants have conditioned their departure upon a pledge that there be no prosecutions. But thinking on these issues has evolved considerably in recent years. Largely driven by the view that collective amnesia amounts to a violation of fundamental human rights, especially those of the victims of atrocities, attention has increasingly turned to the dynamics of post-con?ict accountability. At the high end of the range, of course, sit the new international criminal justice institutions: the ad hoc tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, the various ‘‘hybrid’’ tribunals in Kosovo, East Timor and Cambodia, and the new International Criminal Court. But in terms of sheer numbers, the most signi?cant new institutions are truth and reconciliation commissions. Of va- able architecture, depending upon the prerogatives of the society in question and the features of the past con?ict, they have emerged as a highly popular mechanism within the toolbox of transitional justice. In some cases, the truth commission is held out as an alternative to criminal justice.

• pc34
• Ad Hoc Tribunal
• criminal justice
• dictatorship
• human rights
• Institution
• International Criminal Court
• law
• Peace
• Special Court for Sierra Leone

• National University of Ireland, Ireland

  William Schabas

• University of Ulster, Northern Ireland

  Shane Darcy

William A. Schabas is Professor of Human Rights Law at the National University of Ireland, Galway and Director of the Irish Centre for Human Rights. His numerous publications include Genocide in International Law (2000), The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law (third edition, 2003) and An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (second edition, 2004). He served as an international commissioner on the Sierra Leone Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

Shane Darcy is a research associate at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway, from where he holds an LL.M in International Human Rights Law. He is the author of several journal articles and is currently Managing Editor of Criminal Law Forum.

Policies and ethics