Anyone Who Has a View

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-2

   PDF

2. Reasons

   • Robert C. Pinto

   Pages 3-15

3. The Pragmatic Dimension of Premise Acceptability

   • James B. Freeman

   Pages 17-26

4. Rationality and Judgment

   • Harvey Siegel

   Pages 27-40

5. The Dialectical Tier Revisited

   • Ralph H. Johnson

   Pages 41-53

6. The Rabbit in the Hat

   • Hans Vilhelm Hansen

   Pages 55-68

7. Toulmin’s Warrants

   • David Hitchcock

   Pages 69-82

8. Metadialogues

   • Erik C. W. Krabbe

   Pages 83-90

9. Relationships Among Logic, Dialectic and Rhetoric

   • J. Anthony Blair

   Pages 91-107

10. Logical Fallacies, Dialectical Transgressions, Rhetorical Sins, and Other Failures of Rationality in Argumentation

    • Daniel H. Cohen

    Pages 109-122

11. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof

    • Frans H. Van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser

    Pages 123-132

12. The Ordinary Practice of Presuming and Presumption with Special Attention to Veracity and the Burden of Proof

    • Fred J. Kauffeld

    Pages 133-146

13. Two Conceptions of Openness in Argumentation Theory

    • Scott Jacobs

    Pages 147-155

14. Multidimensionality and Non-Deductiveness in Deliberative Argumentation

    • Christian Kock

    Pages 157-171

15. Argumentation Studies in France

    • Christian Plantin

    Pages 173-187

16. Discourse Correspondence Between Argumentative and Grammatical Sequences

    • Sorin Stati

    Pages 189-193

17. Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions

    • Douglas Walton, Chris Reed

    Pages 195-211

18. Legal Argumentation Theory and the Concept of Law

    • Stefano Bertea

    Pages 213-226

19. Arguers’ Obligations: Another Perspective

    • Joseph W. Wenzel

    Pages 227-236

20. Charles S. Peirce’s Theory of Abduction and the Aristotelian Enthymeme From Signs

    • Manfred Kraus

    Pages 237-254

This volume of the Argumentation Library contains a collection of twenty-six theor­ etical contributions to the study of argumentation. Together they provide an over­ view of recent developments in the theory of argumentation which does justice to the theoretical variety in the field. InAnyone Who Has a View, the subject of argu­ mentation is approached from different angles. Both the formal and informal logical approaches and the rhetorical and communicative approaches arc represented in various ways. We arc convinced that the collection of essays as a whole will be of interest not only to those engaged directly in the study of argumentation, but also to scholars from a variety of disciplines who arc interested in the recent developments in this field. The book opens with an essay by the informal logician Robert C. Pinto. For all the differences between them, James B. Freeman, Harvey Siegel, Ralph H. Johnson, Hans V. Hansen, and J. Anthony Blair are also prominent members of that move­ ment. Some informal logicians either eschew or simply do not use formal methods in their approach to argumentation, while others, such as David Hitchcock, use both formal and informal methods. Erik C.W. Krabbe is a logician who proudly defends a formal dialectical approach to argumentation. Daniel H. Cohen, Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Fred J. Kauffeld, C. Scott Jacobs, Christian Kock, Christian Plantin, Sorin Stati, Chris Reed, Douglas N.

• Argumentation Theory
• Nation
• argue
• discourse
• formal logic
• logic

• University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  Frans H. Eemeren, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

• University of Windsor, Canada

  J. Anthony Blair

• University of Louisville, USA

  Charles A. Willard

Policies and ethics