Skip to main content
Book cover

The Realism-Antirealism Debate in the Age of Alternative Logics

  • Book
  • © 2012

Overview

  • The first work on the Realism-Antirealism debate in the Age of Alternative Logics
  • Large variety of different new topics are undertaken from the viewpoint of the well-known distinction `realism vs. antirealism'
  • Shows the most recent developments in philosophical logic

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (LEUS, volume 23)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (18 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

The relation between logic and knowledge has been at the heart of a lively debate since the 1960s. On the one hand, the epistemic approaches based their formal arguments in the mathematics of Brouwer and intuitionistic logic. Following Michael Dummett, they started to call themselves `antirealists'. Others persisted with the formal background of the Frege-Tarski tradition, where Cantorian set theory is linked via model theory to classical logic. Jaakko Hintikka tried to unify both traditions by means of what is now known as `explicit epistemic logic'. Under this view, epistemic contents are introduced into the object language as operators yielding propositions from propositions, rather than as metalogical constraints on the notion of inference.

The Realism-Antirealism debate has thus had three players: classical logicians, intuitionists and explicit epistemic logicians. The editors of the present volume believe that in the age of Alternative Logics, where manifold developments in logic happen at a breathtaking pace, this debate should be revisited. Contributors to this volume happily took on this challenge and responded with new approaches to the debate from both the explicit and the implicit epistemic point of view.

Reviews

From the reviews:

“The collection is composed of 18 chapters, covering a wide variety of topics. … the volume offers a panorama of research work done in the first decade of the twenty first century, concerning the ongoing debate about realism vs anti-realism and is, therefore, necessary reading for anyone interested in the central questions in this debate.” (Costas Dimitracopoulos, Metascience, February, 2013)

Editors and Affiliations

  • , UFR Philosophie/ UMR-STL: 8163, Université de Lille, Villeneuve d'Asque, France

    Shahid Rahman

  • Centre for Logic & Philosophy of Sc, Philosophy & Moral Science Dept., Ghent University, Gent, Belgium

    Giuseppe Primiero

  • , Département de philosophie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Canada

    Mathieu Marion

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us