Imagination and Critique

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-xi

   PDF

2. Introduction

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 1-6

3. The Story of the Federal Income Tax: A Case Study

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 7-19

4. Vico and the Faculty of Imagination

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 21-37

5. Marx’s Critique of History

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 39-51

6. Addressing Marx Through Rawls

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 53-68

7. Ideology and the Problem of Naming

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 69-84

8. Imagination in Practice

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 85-97

9. What’s the Matter with What’s the Matter with Kansas?

   • James R.L. Noland

   Pages 99-117

10. Freeing Anthropology from Critique

    • James R.L. Noland

    Pages 119-138

11. Imagination and the Possibility of Civil Politics

    • James R.L. Noland

    Pages 139-146

12. Back Matter

    Pages 147-155

    PDF

This book is most easily described as philosophy of history; however, this descr- tion may be a little misleading. Truly, this is a work of applied philosophy that was originally conceived not in a philosophy seminar but in a school of public policy. As a philosopher learning about the study of public policy formation, I was f- quently struck by what I perceived to be two very different sets of assumptions and methods at work. I found these assumptions and methods to be mutually exclusive conceptually, but they were often employed simultaneously. On the one hand, it was often accepted as given when studying past policy changes and political events that history is shaped by impersonal forces, that p- ple’s actions can, and ought only to be understood as manifestations of their own material interests, and that individuals are to be identi?ed as representatives of their respective demographic categories. Thus, for example, the events in question were explained in terms of the race or class of the various parties. When such an approach was challenged with an appeal to the actual arguments and stated rationales of the participants of the historical moment in question, this was taken to be an option that might be employed either in conjunction with the former method or as an alter- tive. Which method one chose to emphasize or employ exclusively seemed more a function of inclination or intuition than rational adjudication.

• John Rawls
• Karl Marx
• MacIntyre
• Marx
• Moral
• Vico
• history
• philosophy
• politics

• Richmond, U.S.A.

  James R. L. Noland

Policies and ethics