Skip to main content
Book cover

Making Strategies in Spatial Planning

Knowledge and Values

  • Book
  • © 2010

Overview

  • Discussion of specific issues in urban planning which require new practices and approaches
  • The interdisciplinary material is supported by practical experiences
  • Useful references and practical examples of integration between strategic planning and evaluation
  • The book aims to improve decision-making process in different urban context

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives (URBANLAND, volume 9)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (21 chapters)

  1. Cognition Dynamics and Knowledge Management in Strategy-Making

Keywords

About this book

This provocative collection of essays challenges traditional ideas of strategic s- tial planning and opens up new avenues of analysis and research. The diversity of contributions here suggests that we need to rethink spatial planning in several f- reaching ways. Let me suggest several avenues of such rethinking that can have both theoretical and practical consequences. First, we need to overcome simplistic bifurcations or dichotomies of assessing outcomes and processes separately from one another. To lapse into the nostalgia of imagining that outcome analysis can exhaust strategic planners’ work might appeal to academics content to study ‘what should be’, but it will doom itself to further irrelevance, ignorance of politics, and rationalistic, technocratic fantasies. But to lapse into an optimism that ‘good process’ is all that strategic planning requires, similarly, rests upon a ction that no credible planning analyst believes: that enough talk will miraculously transcend con ict and produce agreement. Neither sing- minded approach can work, for both avoid dealing with con ict and power, and both too easily avoid dealing with the messiness and the practicalities of negotiating out con icting interests and values – and doing so in ethically and politically critical ways, far from resting content with mere ‘compromise’. Second, we must rethink the sanctity of expertise. By considering analyses of planning outcomes as inseparable from planning processes, these accounts help us to see expertise and substantive analysis as being ‘on tap’, ready to put into use, rather than being particularly and technocratically ‘on top’.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Dipto. Conservazione dei Beni, Architettonici e Ambientali, Università di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy

    Maria Cerreta

  • Fac. Architettura, Dipto. Architettura e Pianificazione, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy

    Grazia Concilio

  • , Department of Architecture and Town Plan, Polytechnic of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Valeria Monno

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us