Skip to main content
  • Book
  • © 1971

The Popper-Carnap Controversy

Authors:

Buy it now

Buying options

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.

Table of contents (9 chapters)

  1. Front Matter

    Pages III-XI
  2. Introduction

    • Alex C. Michalos
    Pages 1-2
  3. Acceptability and Logical Improbability

    • Alex C. Michalos
    Pages 3-15
  4. Two Explicanda and Three Arguments

    • Alex C. Michalos
    Pages 16-33
  5. Instance and Qualified-Instance Confirmation

    • Alex C. Michalos
    Pages 49-59
  6. The Singular Predictive Inference

    • Alex C. Michalos
    Pages 60-69
  7. Back Matter

    Pages 117-124

About this book

1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen­ bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad­ miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention.

Authors and Affiliations

  • University of Guelph, Canada

    Alex C. Michalos

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: The Popper-Carnap Controversy

  • Authors: Alex C. Michalos

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3048-9

  • Publisher: Springer Dordrecht

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

  • Copyright Information: Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-90-247-5127-3Published: 31 July 1971

  • eBook ISBN: 978-94-010-3048-9Published: 06 December 2012

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XI, 124

  • Topics: Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, general

Buy it now

Buying options

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access