Skip to main content
Book cover

The Carrier's Liability for Deck Cargo

A Comparative Study on English and Nordic Law with General Remarks for Future Legislation

  • Book
  • © 2015

Overview

  • Places the complexity of problems relating to deck cargo in a contemporary commercial context
  • An analysis of the treaty law as incorporated by the member states taking into consideration important national differences in interpretation
  • Challenges the view that the “special deck cargo liability” system in the Hamburg and Rotterdam Rules is a novelty compared to the general “presumed fault” system long-practiced in shipping

Part of the book series: Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs (HAMBURG, volume 33)

  • 2893 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (6 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book deals with the carrier’s liability for deck cargo in the Nordic countries and England as state parties of the Hague-Visby Rules. The comparative method serves to illustrate two widely differing methods of dealing with, first, the exclusion of certain deck cargo from the scope of the Hague-Visby Rules and, second, where not excluded, the Rules failure to include a special deck cargo liability regime. Various solutions similar to the English or Nordic approach, or a combination of the two, have also been adopted in a large number of other jurisdictions. Taking into consideration the massive quantities of cargo that are carried on deck today, the subject is more topical than ever.

The complexity of the problem stems from the way in which the deck has, over the years, gradually become a common place to stow cargo. When the Hague Rules were introduced in 1924, deck stowage was an absolute exception due to the great risks involved. As such, the topic must first be looked at in the context of the shipping realities in which the Hague Rules were drafted and then in terms of today’s shipping realities. The comparative analysis leading up to the author’s conclusions and general remarks for future legislation consists of two parts, the first dealing with the situations in which the carrier is permitted to stow cargo on deck, and the second with the carrier’s liability for deck cargo where he has stowed cargo on deck with, or as the case may be, without such permission.

Authors and Affiliations

  • International Max Planck Research School, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Hamburg, Germany

    Lina Wiedenbach

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us