Overview
- Editors:
-
-
Sam BrĂ¼nner
-
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup/Copenhagen, Denmark
-
Bent Langfeldt
-
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The County Hospital, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, C., Denmark
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (19 chapters)
-
-
-
- S. A. Feig, B. M. Galkin, H. D. Muir
Pages 15-18
-
-
- B. M. Galkin, S. A. Feig, P. Frasca, H. D. Muir, R. Z. Soriano
Pages 25-30
-
-
-
-
-
- I. Andersson, B. F. SigfĂºsson
Pages 62-66
-
- B. A. Thomas, J. L. Price
Pages 67-72
-
- S. Jakobsen, J. Beckmann, M. Beckmann, S. BrĂ¼nner
Pages 73-77
-
-
-
- B. M. Galkin, S. A. Feig, A. S. Patchefsky, H. D. Muir
Pages 89-94
-
-
- S. Watt-Boolsen, M. Blichert-Toft, J. A. Andersen, K. West Andersen
Pages 97-105
-
-
- S. A. Feig, B. M. Galkin, H. D. Muir
Pages 111-123
-
- M. Nielsen, L. Christensen, U. Dyreborg, J. A. Andersen
Pages 124-129
About this book
The Third International Copenhagen Symposium on Detection of Breast Cancer afforded a further opportunity for scientists from all over the world to come together and present important papers con cerning breast cancer and early diagnostic procedures. The Sympo sium was an opportunity to learn from extensive screening proce dures carried out at outstanding centers in the United States, Sweden, the Netherlands, and England. Furthermore, the Sympo sium dealt with new modalities such as ultrasonography, magnifi cation techniques, and magnetic resonance; and very important contributions concerning self-examination, fine needle aspiration biopsy, and radiation risks were presented. A whole section was also dedicated to the highly important cooperation between radiologist, surgeon, and pathologist. It is our sincere hope that a study of the different aspects of breast cancer presented in this volume will encourage the reader to join in the struggle against this dreadful dis ease. December 1986 S. Brunner B. Langfeldt Contents B. Nielsen Image Quality in Mammography: Physical and Technical Limitations . 1 S. A. Feig, B. M. Galkin, and H. D. Muir Clinical Considerations in Selection of Dedicated Mammography Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 . . . E. A. Sickles The Role of Magnification Technique in Modern Mammography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 B. M. Galkin, S. A. Feig, P. Frasca, H. D. Muir, and R. Z. Soriano Imaging Capabilities and Dose Considerations of Different Mammographic Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 . . . E. A. Sickles Computed Tomography Scanning, Transillumination, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A. G. Haus Recent Trends in Screen-Film Mammography: TechnicalFactors and Radiation Dose . . . . . . . . . .
Editors and Affiliations
-
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup/Copenhagen, Denmark
Sam BrĂ¼nner
-
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The County Hospital, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, C., Denmark
Bent Langfeldt