Aquinas and Maimonides on the Possibility of the Knowledge of God

1. Front Matter

   Pages i-xx

   PDF

2. The Dispute on the Divine Attributes

   Pages 15-64

3. Aquinas and Maimonides on the Divine Names

   Pages 65-126

4. The Quaestio de Attributis and Zechariah 14, 9

   Pages 127-160

5. The Quaestio de Attributis and the Limits of Natural Knowledge

   Pages 161-209

6. The Knowledge of the Existence of God

   Pages 210-244

7. Back Matter

   Pages 245-324

   PDF

Purpose Moses Maimonides’ Guide of the Perplexed is pervaded by a p- manent tension regarding the possibility and extent of the knowledge of God by a created intellect, which lies at the roots of the 13th century controversy over Maimonides’ writings. While Maimonides asserts that “its purpose is to give indications to a religious man for whom the validity of our Law has become 1 established in his soul and has become actual in his belief,” one of its early opponents, Meshullam ben Solomon, writes referring to him: “Those who deny the proper attributes of God speak out 2 until faith has been drained out of man.” He will instead claim to be “determined to know the God of my fathers and my 3 thoughts are continuously of Him”. Meshullam understands that despite Maimonides’ interest in preserving his readers’ faith, he leads them to skepticism by denying the possibility of any positive knowledge of the essence of God.

• Divine Attributes
• Divine Names
• Knowledge of God
• Moses Maimonides
• Thomas Aquinas
• knowledge
• reason

Policies and ethics