Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Natural Experiment on Electoral Law Reform

Evaluating the Long Run Consequences of 1990s Electoral Reform in Italy and Japan

  • Book
  • © 2011

Overview

Editors:
  1. Daniela Giannetti

    1. Department of Political Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

  2. Bernard Grofman

    1. School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA

    View editor publications

    You can also search for this editor in PubMed   Google Scholar

  • Teams up experts in Italian and Japanese politics in a unique comparative analysis of electoral reforms in these countries
  • Considers electoral systems in political, social, and cultural context
  • Features data appendices and a glossary of terms
  • Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Part of the book series: Studies in Public Choice (SIPC, volume 24)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

Log in via an institution
eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (6 chapters)

  1. Front Matter

    Pages i-ix
    Download chapter PDF

  2. Introduction: Long-Run Consequences of Electoral Rules Change: Comparing Italy and Japan

    • Bernard Grofman, Daniela Giannetti
    Pages 1-12

  3. Party Competition Under New Electoral Rules in Italy and Japan, 1994–2009

    • Aldo Di Virgilio, Junko Kato
    Pages 13-33

  4. The Changing Bases of Party Support in Italy and Japan: Similarities and Differences

    • Daniela Giannetti, Naoko Taniguchi
    Pages 35-59

  5. Nominating Candidates Under New Rules in Italy and Japan: You Cannot Bargain with Resources You Do Not Have

    • Aldo Di Virgilio, Steven R. Reed
    Pages 61-75

  6. Electoral Reform and Factional Politics in Italy and Japan

    • Daniela Giannetti, Michael F. Thies
    Pages 77-96

  7. Electoral Reform in Italy and Japan: Unanticipated Outcomes?

    • Ethan Scheiner, Filippo Tronconi
    Pages 97-113

  8. Back Matter

    Pages 115-162
    Download chapter PDF
Back to top

Keywords

About this book

In the early 1990s, major electoral reforms took place in both Italy and Japan; each replaced a form of “proportional representation” (in which voters cast a ballot for a party list) with a “mixed member” system (in which voters cast ballots for individual candidates and party lists). The reforms were enacted by political elites in the context of divisions within the dominant party, changing patterns of party support, and party splits, in efforts to retain power while responding to charges of corruption, clientelism, and lack of accountability. The experiences of both countries provide a laboratory in which to investigate the effects and implications of the reforms, and, more broadly to analyze voter behavior in the context of institutional change. The introduction provides an overview of post-WWII politics and electoral reform in Italy and Japan. In each of the next four chapters, specialists in Italian and Japanese electoral politics are teamed up to review data both before and after the reforms. Within this comparative framework, the authors explore such topics as changes in party competition, candidate selection mechanisms, and intra-party politics. The concluding chapter considers the longer-term consequences—both anticipated and unanticipated—of the reforms; despite superficially similar conditions, the effects in the two countries were dramatically different: in Japan, the new system has taken hold, with minor modifications, while in Italy, there was a reversion to a proportional representation system. As the essays in this volume demonstrate, to understand why similar reforms had such different effects in the two countries we must examine how electoral systems are embedded in broader institutional and social arrangements, and at the complex interplay of political geography, political history, and the rational calculations of political actors.

Reviews

From the reviews:

“This edited book … examines the effects of electoral reform by comparing the case of two countries—Japan and Italy—to gain a better understanding of how the choice of electoral rules affects political outcomes. The electoral reforms in Japan and Italy indeed provide excellent cases for studying the effects of electoral systems … . this book is highly recommended, not only for specialists of Japanese and Italian politics but also for scholars and students working on elections and electoral systems, broadly speaking.” (Yoshikuni Ono, Social Science Japan Journal, Vol. 16 (1), January, 2013)

Editors and Affiliations

  • Department of Political Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Daniela Giannetti

  • School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA

    Bernard Grofman

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Back to top

Search

Navigation