Skip to main content

Interpretation of Law in the Age of Enlightenment

From the Rule of the King to the Rule of Law

  • Book
  • © 2011

Overview

  • Unique interdisciplinary work in an unexplored field
  • A collaboration of leading historians of European law
  • Provides a missing link to those working in related disciplines.
  • Historical reflection on how a governing ideology actually plays out in public institutions
  • Provides important relevance to various disciplines related to textual interpretation

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library (LAPS, volume 95)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (10 chapters)

  1. Introduction

  2. The Case of France

  3. The Case of Germany

  4. The Nature of Legal Interpretation

  5. Concluding Remarks

Keywords

About this book

A collaboration of leading historians of European law and philosophers of law and politics identifying and explaining the practice of interpretation of law in the 18th century. The goal: establishing the actual practice in the Age of Enlightenment, and explaining why this was the case. The ideology of the Age was that law, i.e., the will of the sovereign, can be explicitly and appropriately stated, thus making interpretation redundant. However, the reality was that in the 18th century, there was no one leading source of national law that would be the object of interpretation. Instead, there was a plurality of sources of law: the Roman Law, local customary law, and the royal ordinance. However, in deciding a case in a court of law, the law must speak with one voice. Hence, interpretation to unify the norms was inevitable. What was the process? What role did justification in terms of reason, the hallmark of the Enlightenment, play? These are some of the questions addressed.

Editors and Affiliations

  • , Graduate School of Law, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan

    Yasutomo Morigiwa

  • Max-Planck-Institut fuer europaeische Re, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

    Michael Stolleis

  • , EHESS, Ecole Normale Superieure, Paris, France

    Jean-Louis Halperin

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us