Logo - springer
Slogan - springer

Philosophy - Logic & Philosophy of Language | Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic

Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic

van der Schaar, Maria (Ed.)

2013, XVIII, 162 p.

Available Formats:
eBook
Information

Springer eBooks may be purchased by end-customers only and are sold without copy protection (DRM free). Instead, all eBooks include personalized watermarks. This means you can read the Springer eBooks across numerous devices such as Laptops, eReaders, and tablets.

You can pay for Springer eBooks with Visa, Mastercard, American Express or Paypal.

After the purchase you can directly download the eBook file or read it online in our Springer eBook Reader. Furthermore your eBook will be stored in your MySpringer account. So you can always re-download your eBooks.

 
$99.00

(net) price for USA

ISBN 978-94-007-5137-8

digitally watermarked, no DRM

Included Format: PDF and EPUB

download immediately after purchase


learn more about Springer eBooks

add to marked items

Hardcover
Information

Hardcover version

You can pay for Springer Books with Visa, Mastercard, American Express or Paypal.

Standard shipping is free of charge for individual customers.

 
$129.00

(net) price for USA

ISBN 978-94-007-5136-1

free shipping for individuals worldwide

usually dispatched within 3 to 5 business days


add to marked items

Softcover
Information

Softcover (also known as softback) version.

You can pay for Springer Books with Visa, Mastercard, American Express or Paypal.

Standard shipping is free of charge for individual customers.

 
$129.00

(net) price for USA

ISBN 978-94-007-9587-7

free shipping for individuals worldwide

usually dispatched within 3 to 5 business days


add to marked items

  • The first book to relate the theory of judgment to the epistemic foundation of logic
  • Uses the history of philosophy to generate solutions to contemporary problems in the foundation of logic  
  • Covers both analytic and continental perspectives ​
This compelling reevaluation of the relationship between logic and knowledge affirms the key role that the notion of judgement must play in such a review. The commentary repatriates the concept of judgement in the discussion, banished in recent times by the logical positivism of Wittgenstein, Hilbert and Schlick, and the Platonism of Bolzano. The volume commences with the insights of Swedish philosopher Per Martin-Löf, the father of constructive type theory, for whom logic is a demonstrative science in which judgement is a settled feature of the landscape. His paper opens the first of four sections that examine, in turn, historical philosophical assessments of judgement and reason; their place in early modern philosophy; the notion of judgement and logical theory in Wolff, Kant and Neo-Kantians like Windelband; their development in the Husserlian phenomenological paradigm; and the work of Bolzano, Russell and Frege. The papers, whose authors include Per Martin-Löf, Göran Sundholm, Michael Della Rocca and Robin Rollinger, represent a finely judged editorial selection highlighting work on philosophers exercised by the question of whether or not an epistemic notion of judgement has a role to play in logic. The volume will be of profound interest to students and academicians for its application of historical developments in philosophy to the solution of vexatious contemporary issues in the foundation of logic. ​

Content Level » Research

Keywords » Bolzano and analytic truth - Bolzano and conceptual truth - Brentano on states of affairs - Conception of mathematics - Concepts of knowledge - Constructions and proofs - Constructive type theory and analyticity - Constructive type theory and logical positivism - Constructive type theory and unanswerable questions - Epistemic rules and Descartes - Frege, Russell and the assertion sign - Heying and assertion - History of Logic - Husserl on states of affairs - Judgement and Bolzano - Judgement and Descartes - Judgement and Frege - Judgement and Husserl - Judgement and Kant - Judgement and Per Martin-Löf - Judgement and Russell - Judgement and Spinoza - Judgement and Windelband - Judgement and Wolff - Judgement and reason - Judgement and the epistemic foundation of logic - Judgement and the principle of sufficient reason - Stump on states of affairs - Theory of Judgement - Windelband and Brentano - Wolff and Kant - judgement and ground

Related subjects » Logic & Philosophy of Language - Philosophy - Theoretical and Computational Chemistry

Table of contents 

Preface.- Part 1. Constructivism, Judgement, and Reason.- Chapter 1. Verificationism then and now: Per Martin-Löf.- Chapter 2. Demonstrations versus Proofs, being an afterword to 'Constructions, Proofs and the meaning of Logical Constants': Göran Sundholm.- Chapter 3. Containment and Variation: Two Strands in the Development of Analyticity from Aristotle to Martin-Löf: Göran Sundholm.- Part 2. Judgement and Reason in the Seventeenth Century.- Chapter 4. Decartes' Theory of Judgement: Warranted Assertions, the Key to Science: Elodie Cassan.- Chapter 5. Striving, Oomph, and Intelligibility in Spinoza: Michael Della Rocca.- Part 3. Kant, Neo-Kantianism, and Bolzano.- Chapter 6. The Role of Wolff's Analysis of Judgments in Kant's Inaugural Dissertation: Johan Blok.- Chapter 7. Windelband on 'Beurteilung’: Arnaud Dewalque.- Chapter 8. A Priori Knowledge in Bolzano; Conceptual Truths and Judgements: Stefan Roski.- Part 4. Husserl, Frege and Russell.- Chapter 9. Immanent and Real States of Affairs in Husserl's Early Theory of Judgement: Robin Rollinger.- Chapter 10. Frege and Russell on Assertion: Jeremy Kelly.​

Popular Content within this publication 

 

Articles

Read this Book on Springerlink

Services for this book

New Book Alert

Get alerted on new Springer publications in the subject area of Logic.