Editors:
First comprehensive analysis of the notion of robustness and its implications
Contributions by the world’s leading experts in the field
Shows the crucial link between the notion of robustness and the practical turn on philosophy of science
Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (BSPS, volume 292)
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (14 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
About this book
Editors and Affiliations
-
Paris, France
Léna Soler
-
, LHPS, Archives H. Poincaré, Nancy, France
Emiliano Trizio
-
, Department of Philosophy, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, USA
Thomas Nickles
-
, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
William Wimsatt
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: Characterizing the Robustness of Science
Book Subtitle: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science
Editors: Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, William Wimsatt
Series Title: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2759-5
Publisher: Springer Dordrecht
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, Philosophy and Religion (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012
Hardcover ISBN: 978-94-007-2758-8Published: 23 March 2012
Softcover ISBN: 978-94-007-9643-0Published: 16 April 2014
eBook ISBN: 978-94-007-2759-5Published: 22 March 2012
Series ISSN: 0068-0346
Series E-ISSN: 2214-7942
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: X, 374
Topics: Philosophy of Science, History of Science, Science, Humanities and Social Sciences, multidisciplinary, Philosophy of Technology, Philosophy of Biology