Skip to main content

Conservation Monitoring in Freshwater Habitats

A Practical Guide and Case Studies

  • Book
  • © 2010

Overview

  • Highlights the need for clear conservation management goals, rarely considered in previous publications on freshwater monitoring, though fisheries are more familiar with the concept
  • Promotes the concept of integrated monitoring of biological conservation interest and water quality
  • Uses the results of field trials to draw attention to the shortcomings inherent in many existing monitoring projects

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (32 chapters)

  1. Setting the scene

  2. Biological Indicators for Freshwater Habitats

  3. Rivers: Threats and Monitoring Issues

Keywords

About this book

As in the terrestrial environment, most data collection from freshwater habitats to date falls into the survey, surveillance or research categories. The critical difference between these exercises and a monitoring project is that a monitoring project will clearly identify when we need to make a management response. A Model for Conservation Management and Monitoring Monitoring (as defined by Hellawell) is essentially a tool of practical conservation management, and Fig. 1.1 shows a simple, but effective, model for nature conser- tion management and monitoring. The need for clear decision-making is implicit in this model. First we must decide what would represent a favourable state for the key habitat or species, and then we must decide when to intervene if the state is (or becomes) unfavourable. A third, often overlooked, but equally important, decision concerns when we would consider the habitat or species to have recovered; this is unlikely to be the same point that we became concerned about it. This decision not only has resource imp- cations, it can also have major implications for other habitats and species (prey species are an obvious example). All of these decisions are essential to the devel- ment of an efficient and effective monitoring project.

Editors and Affiliations

  • Orielton Field Centre, Countryside Council for Wales, Pembroke, United Kingdom

    Clive Hurford

  • Administrative Board, Västerbotten County, Umeå, Sweden

    Michael Schneider

  • International Fisheries Institute, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom

    Ian Cowx

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us