Skip to main content
  • Book
  • © 2021

State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements

Scope, Utility and Potential

  • Deals specifically with state-to-state arbitration arising from investment agreements and discusses options for resolution of its procedural hurdles
  • Presents state-to-state arbitration as a novel alternative for investment dispute settlement
  • Addresses the co-existence of different dispute settlement forums in investment law, which is a widely debated topic

Part of the book series: European Yearbook of International Economic Law (EUROYEAR, volume 10)

Part of the book sub series: EYIEL Monographs - Studies in European and International Economic Law (EYIELMONO)

Buy it now

Buying options

eBook USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.

About this book

This book discusses the use of the compromissory clause in international investment agreements (IIAs) for interstate dispute resolution. It puts forward the possibility of using state-to-state arbitration based on the compromissory clause in IIAs as an alternative means of resolving investment disputes in light of the global debate on the shortcomings of investor-state arbitration.

The book’s main conclusion is that state-to-state arbitration may be used as an alternative to currently popular investor-state arbitration by resolving procedural hurdles which impede its acceptance. It becomes more important with the removal of investor-state arbitration as an option in certain recent IIAs, which then elevates state-to-state arbitration as the sole option for binding third party dispute resolution in the treaty. Even then, it is unlikely to replace investor-state arbitration completely due to its inherent shortcomings, such as the risk of re-politicising disputes and a lack of direct control over the process for the affected investors. Nevertheless, the availability of an alternative forum will benefit all parties involved, as they will no longer be wholly dependent on investor-state arbitration, which can be affected by events such as denunciation from the ICSID Convention or the refusal of a host state to enforce an arbitration award.


Authors and Affiliations

  • Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Angshuman Hazarika

About the author

Angshuman Hazarika is a qualified lawyer from India with research interests in International Economic Law and specific focus on International Trade Law and International Investment Law. He obtained his Bachelors degree in Law from Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, India and subsequently completed his LL.M. at Europa-Institut, Saarland University with the Angela Merkel Scholarship from DAAD. After completion of his degree he worked as a Research Associate at the Chair of Prof. Dr. Marc Bungenberg LL.M. in Saarland University and simultaneously pursued his doctoral research under his guidance.

Bibliographic Information

Buy it now

Buying options

eBook USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access