Skip to main content

Contextualism, Factivity and Closure

A Union That Should Not Take Place?

  • Book
  • © 2018

Overview

  • Analyzes an inconsistency within epistemic contextualism known as the factivity problem
  • Details different solutions to the factivity problem developed by key philosophers
  • Identifies three main approaches used to solve this problem

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (8 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This book analyses an inconsistency within epistemic contextualism known as the factivity problem. It also provides key insights into epistemic contextualism, an important innovation in contemporary epistemology, enabling readers to gain a better understanding of the various solutions to the factivity problem. As the authors demonstrate, each explanation is based on a different interpretation of the problem.  

Divided into seven chapters, the book offers comprehensive coverage of this topic, which will be of major interest to philosophers engaged in epistemology and the philosophy of language. After an introductory chapter, Chapter 2 presents the most common understanding of epistemic contextualism and its semantic basis. It also clarifies the epistemological implications of the theory’s semantic assumptions. This chapter also explains the main argument of the factivity problem.

The next four chapters discuss the respective solutions proposed by Wolfgang Freitag, Alexander Dinges, Anthony Brueckner and Christopher Buford, Michael Ashfield, Martin Montminy and Wes Skolits, and Peter Baumann. Stefano Leardi and Nicla Vassallo highlight the similarities and commonalities, identifying three main approaches to the factivity problem.

Chapter 7 provides a brief overview of the solutions proposed to solve the factivity problem and presents an outline of the conclusions reached in the book.



Authors and Affiliations

  • School of Humanities, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy

    Stefano Leardi

  • School of Humanities, University of Genova, Genova, Italy

    Nicla Vassallo

Bibliographic Information

  • Book Title: Contextualism, Factivity and Closure

  • Book Subtitle: A Union That Should Not Take Place?

  • Authors: Stefano Leardi, Nicla Vassallo

  • Series Title: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16155-2

  • Publisher: Springer Cham

  • eBook Packages: Religion and Philosophy, Philosophy and Religion (R0)

  • Copyright Information: The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

  • Softcover ISBN: 978-3-030-16154-5Published: 08 April 2019

  • eBook ISBN: 978-3-030-16155-2Published: 26 March 2019

  • Series ISSN: 2211-4548

  • Series E-ISSN: 2211-4556

  • Edition Number: 1

  • Number of Pages: XII, 94

  • Number of Illustrations: 1 b/w illustrations

  • Topics: Epistemology, Mathematical Logic and Foundations

Publish with us